Search Results - claim free

Blog Post: Getting The Very Best Out Of Comprehensive Life Cover: Life cover is considered to be a definite approach to getting assured of a trouble-free existence in the days of future as it embraces a number of emergencies. The latter include the basic…; Added by Geo Msn at 4:41am on September 8, 2016

Blog Post: Recruitment Marketing Articles of the Week 10.23.10 to 10.29.10: Here is our weekly feature in which we share the top articles we enjoyed from the past week about recruitment marketing. This…; Added by Chris Brablc at 10:17am on October 29, 2010

Blog Post: Defining Your Offer – Even Volunteers Don’t Work For Free: Did you think volunteers work for free? A lot of people make this…; Added by Karina Crooks at 2:28am on March 3, 2016

Blog Post: Blogs, Wikipedia, and the dangers of moving digital: I've heard recently that Britanica is going out of print. For those of you who don't know, Britanica used to publish many versions of books called Encyclopedias. Back when I was growing up in the…; Added by Joshua Lee at 6:35pm on June 21, 2012

Comment on: Blog Post 'Agency Recruiters will always beat Internal Recruiters. Always.': a but more subjective), but to frame them as absolutes undercuts any comments of merit in the post. There are great agency recruiter who provide value to their clients based on tight relationships with passive candidates that in-house teams may have a harder time finding (typically due to bandwidth). There are shitty agency recruiters that don't give a damn about the candidates, don't take time to understand their clients, and sit around all day thinking of new ways to write psuedo-attention grabbing email subjects like "YOUR next code NINJA!!!" There are great in-house recruiters that will tell a candidate when their role is not the best fit for them (despite the posts claim to the contrary). Why? Because they know if they push for a bad hire it won't last; potentially damaging the career of the candidates, denting their relationship with hiring managers, and wasting the companies money (not to mention they'll be starting over again in less than a year). Yes, there are also lazy in-house recruiters with an order takers mentality who just want to fill the req and move on. Those recruiters suck. Charney is right. There is a place for agency recruiters who provide value. Most great in-house recruiters also started their careers in agency, so they get it - but shitting on your clients is generally not the best business approach.…; Added by Lars Schmidt at 10:10am on November 13, 2013

Blog Post: Know the writers who write!!: Essay writing is one of the essential part of the entire academic curriculum but some student would…; Added by Rosie Wells at 6:06am on August 19, 2013

Blog Post: Battle of the Online Resume Builders: As the popular commercial reminds us, there seems to be an app for just about everything these days. For the past year or so, I’ve noticed a new category of online apps gaining visibility: online…; Added by HiringSciences at 6:03pm on November 11, 2009

Topic: OT - "Simons Says..." Move Over for "Siri Says...": ation uses natural language processing to answer questions, make recommendations, and perform actions by delegating requests to an expanding set of web services. The iOS app is the first public product by its makers,[citation needed] who are focused on artificial intelligence applications. Siri was acquired by Apple Inc. on April 28, 2010.[1] Before Apple's purchase, Siri had announced that their software would soon be available for BlackBerry and for Android-powered phones, but all development efforts for non-Apple platforms were cancelled after Apple's purchase of Siri.[2] Siri's marketing claims include that Siri adapts to the user's individual preferences over time and personalizes results, as well as accomplishing tasks such as making dinner reservations and reserving a cab.[3] Siri was launched as an integrated feature, although as a beta version, of the Apple iPhone 4S, launched in October 2011 & currently remains an iPhone 4S exclusive . But some hackers have ported Siri onto the iPhone 4 as well , & they claim that Siri would eventually be available for jailbroken iPhone 4 in near future . [4] …; Added by Valentino Martinez at 4:39pm on October 17, 2011

Comment on: Topic 'Question on acquired vs. hired candidate': e rational. Basically, the part that's similar is some technicality or claim by the client that relieves them of paying my fee. I don't want to talk about my situation since what's relevant is yours. First, let me tell you that your issue is much more complicated than what appears on the surface to lay people. That's not to demean anybody's intelligence but this is not an issue of "intelligence" per se but rather the letter of the law. I'm also a 3rd year law student by the way. I'm embarking on my third career change. :) Anyway, let me oversimplify what is actually quite an interesting and intriguing problem you have. You have one agreement and they are flaming some corporate merger trumps your fee agreement provision. It's a battle of contracts. One of the things to find out is if "she", the candidate" is a true bone fide "corporation" / business. If they acquired her business in a merger than there are actual steps that need to be taken. Any material misstep in the official legal process that is required for a true bone fide merger and its a fraud. It's no merger at all. Get me? Another approach is to actually charge them with something serious like fraud and intentionally screwing you over. This is juicy punitive stuff which means you may not only get the value of your services or the contract price that they would owe you under normal circumstances but that because their actions were done with mal intent you would get the value of what dollar figure would punish them. If they are a $1m a year firm, about $200k would be right and so forth (however this is hard to prove). You have to prove they intentionally knowingly went against your agreement so they could avoid paying fees instead of their likely claim of a legitimate business interest in her firm's services. 1. Just taking at face value what you stated, you have a good case. 2. To determine how good, will require more information. Probably not worth fighting unless you have at least 65-70% chance of winning. 3. Even if you do win, it will cost you money. So answer yourself this question. Do you think that a properly addressed and serious demand letter and a little bullying will get them to see the error in their ways and settle out of court? Do you know what kind of people they are and how deep their pockets are? If they are the type to fight it out, you're probably better off just letting it go and chalking it up to a lesson learned. Feel free to email or contact me. Your situation is of interest to me but I am not an attorney.…; Added by Joshua Lee at 7:08pm on June 15, 2012

Blog Post: Obama outlines job-creation plan: If it goes according to plan... there will be a need for Civil engineers and construction crews.

(CNN) -- President-elect Barack Obama on Saturday offered an outline of his economic…; Added by 01. Lonnie McRorey at 10:23am on November 22, 2008