a position in which there was no Intake session (hat tip: Scott Love) until after candidates were presented. Yes, what I'm saying is that my friend had no Intake Session with neither the Internal Recruiter nor the Hiring Manager, and now he's mad at himself - frankly, the candidate slate presented by Third-Party Recruiters was used by the Internal Recruiter as a starting point for conversations regarding what the Manager was really looking for!
This whole thing has FUBAR written all over it. Don't believe me? Take a look:
Dec 15, 5:03 PM - I just rejected all of the candidates in queue with the designation "overqualified" for a lack of a better checkbox. I briefly spoke with the hiring manager this morning. His comment was that, while the candidates had the 3-4 identified requirements listed for the position, they also had a lot of other experience that he is not interested in. He's looking for a "purist" if you will. He told me he would try to give more specifics, but wanted to let you know what I do.
Nov 14, 3:40 PM - I find it necessary at this point to remind all of you who are interested in working with XYZ Co. to please respect our processes. I am too busy to chase down all of you randomly contacting our colleagues you find on LinkIn requesting engagement. Believe me, this is not the way to get in our good graces; in fact, it will do our relationship much more harm than good. Do not contact anyone at XYZ directly unless I have given you permission to do so. Thank you.
Nov 10, 2:47 PM - We currently have 2 candidates in the mix, but neither is our ideal because they do not have cGMP or GMP experience. This is a qualification we discovered is critical while interviewing others last week.
In an effort to narrow your search - please re-evaluate any candidates you would like to submit (or have submitted that I haven't reviewed yet) for cGMP or BMP experience.
Nov 07, 4:22 PM - Sorry for not telling everyone before I left on vacation, but ran out of time. I just returned today, and have a lot of messages to return and candidates to review. Please bare with me! I will get back to each of you as soon as I can.
Oct 06, 7:56 PM - We are on a short time-line for this position (probably a month left to identify someone before we lose it), so I absolutely appreciate your quick turnaround times - all of you.
Oct 01, 4:33 PM - 2 things: I got quick feedback from my HM on this position today saying that none of the candidates fit what he's looking for. He needs, simply, a PhD biochemistry scientist who does protein purification.
Before I get too much pushback from you guys, because I know some of your candidates have this, I am meeting with the HM on Monday to discuss all of the resumes he's received so far. Hopefully, I'll be able to get a clearer understanding of his needs - and be able to translate them to you.
Aug 26, 8:31 PM - Default Message - Please, no direct phone calls or emails. Also, please do not use this as business development. I'll reach out to you directly if I need to.…