Comments - What are your thoughts on....candidate ownership. - RecruitingBlogs2024-03-28T18:06:05Zhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=502551%3ABlogPost%3A1749063&xn_auth=noThanks for the comments. They…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2013-09-05:502551:Comment:17509122013-09-05T12:43:09.486ZDaren J. Mongellohttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/Daren751
<p>Thanks for the comments. They were all spot on. I agree that these scenarios should be covered in the agreement.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments. They were all spot on. I agree that these scenarios should be covered in the agreement.</p> I would fight for it. We have…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2013-08-29:502551:Comment:17497332013-08-29T20:19:12.878ZSteve N Odellhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/SteveNOdell
<p>I would fight for it. We have in our agreement that client could only do that if they were very recently having discussions.It happens all the time. Sometimes it is a matter of educating the client on proper protocol. If they "get it" and you can move on under that agreement it may turn into a great client. If they will not be flexible with that and want to screw you then "you simply avoid" as Jerry suggests, or recruit the heck out of their people. We always need sources.</p>
<p>I would fight for it. We have in our agreement that client could only do that if they were very recently having discussions.It happens all the time. Sometimes it is a matter of educating the client on proper protocol. If they "get it" and you can move on under that agreement it may turn into a great client. If they will not be flexible with that and want to screw you then "you simply avoid" as Jerry suggests, or recruit the heck out of their people. We always need sources.</p> There are 2 types of clients…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2013-08-29:502551:Comment:17497152013-08-29T13:13:36.659ZJerry Albrighthttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/JerryAlbright
<p>There are 2 types of clients out there: Those who value your service and those who would rather not use your service. Companies that are going to look for any way to "prove" they do not owe you a fee are the ones to simply avoid. Why battle?</p>
<p>There are 2 types of clients out there: Those who value your service and those who would rather not use your service. Companies that are going to look for any way to "prove" they do not owe you a fee are the ones to simply avoid. Why battle?</p> I just watched a video by the…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2013-08-29:502551:Comment:17494832013-08-29T13:10:47.543ZChadd Balbihttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/ChaddBalbi
<p>I just watched a video by the "According to Danny" site by Danny Cahill that covered this subject. If you know a client will try and take ownership of a candidate because they "know" them from a few years ago, you have to protect yourself upfront. Get in the agreement that this will only hold water if the candidate you submitted is <em>currently</em> in the interview process with your client. If they had them in their ATS from a few years ago that should not matter. </p>
<p>I just watched a video by the "According to Danny" site by Danny Cahill that covered this subject. If you know a client will try and take ownership of a candidate because they "know" them from a few years ago, you have to protect yourself upfront. Get in the agreement that this will only hold water if the candidate you submitted is <em>currently</em> in the interview process with your client. If they had them in their ATS from a few years ago that should not matter. </p> We faced this situation and t…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2013-08-28:502551:Comment:17493782013-08-28T15:46:34.594ZAmbrish Kochikarhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/AmbrishKochikar
<p>We faced this situation and the candidate did declare he interviewed with our client 3 years earlier. He is part of their user group meetings, from time to time, but they just never thought of asking him to interview for a job, as he owned his own business. The client, upon our presenting the resume, consent and note on prior interview, did agree to work through us, but for a fee that was 3/4ths of our regular fee. I can't say I object to that arrangement, given the circumstances. </p>
<p>We faced this situation and the candidate did declare he interviewed with our client 3 years earlier. He is part of their user group meetings, from time to time, but they just never thought of asking him to interview for a job, as he owned his own business. The client, upon our presenting the resume, consent and note on prior interview, did agree to work through us, but for a fee that was 3/4ths of our regular fee. I can't say I object to that arrangement, given the circumstances. </p> The best way to counter these…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2013-08-27:502551:Comment:17491762013-08-27T13:03:35.170ZJerry Albrighthttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/JerryAlbright
<p>The best way to counter these situations is to simply not work with companies who allow it. Choose your potential clients wisely. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The best way to counter these situations is to simply not work with companies who allow it. Choose your potential clients wisely. </p>
<p> </p>