Comments - Recruiting with Rainman: Definitely Time for SourceCon - RecruitingBlogs2024-03-28T23:41:18Zhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=502551%3ABlogPost%3A1782649&xn_auth=noSigh.... Derdiver, you've no…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-24:502551:Comment:17836782014-01-24T00:33:08.955ZAmy Ala Millerhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/AmyAla
<p>Sigh.... Derdiver, you've no idea. I have been referred to as "the life of the party" at least twice in my lifetime. :)</p>
<p>Sigh.... Derdiver, you've no idea. I have been referred to as "the life of the party" at least twice in my lifetime. :)</p> I sincerely look forward to m…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-22:502551:Comment:17833372014-01-22T00:07:30.916ZDerdiverhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/SWITM
I sincerely look forward to meeting you. I will say though the non attendance of Amy has dulled the experience now...;)
I sincerely look forward to meeting you. I will say though the non attendance of Amy has dulled the experience now...;) OK then. I must have just mi…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-21:502551:Comment:17832392014-01-21T21:50:58.892ZJerry Albrighthttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/JerryAlbright
<p>OK then. I must have just misread things. Sorry. Carry on.</p>
<p>OK then. I must have just misread things. Sorry. Carry on.</p> Jerry: You're right, I'm not…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-21:502551:Comment:17833242014-01-21T21:42:25.826ZMatt Charneyhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/MattCharney
<p>Jerry: You're right, I'm not "recruiting" the content contributors to fill jobs. My above example was specific to sourcing, and that's recruiting, which this is most decidedly not - but was not part of the original example or follow up comment.</p>
<p>Jerry: You're right, I'm not "recruiting" the content contributors to fill jobs. My above example was specific to sourcing, and that's recruiting, which this is most decidedly not - but was not part of the original example or follow up comment.</p> The clear difference between…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-21:502551:Comment:17833212014-01-21T21:28:54.578ZJerry Albrighthttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/JerryAlbright
<p>The clear difference between your description above and real sourcing is pretty clear - you are not "recruiting" any of the content contributors to change jobs. There isn't a big "rejection" factor if you will. Sorry Matt. Nice try, but......wrong-o.</p>
<p></p>
<p>The clear difference between your description above and real sourcing is pretty clear - you are not "recruiting" any of the content contributors to change jobs. There isn't a big "rejection" factor if you will. Sorry Matt. Nice try, but......wrong-o.</p>
<p></p> Jerry - Yes, in fact, the mod…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-21:502551:Comment:17830612014-01-21T17:10:35.006ZMatt Charneyhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/MattCharney
<p>Jerry - Yes, in fact, the model upon which I work as an editor IS building a talent pipeline. I've done both marketing and direct sourcing, and essentially, both involve finding someone with a pretty niche skill set (quality writing about recruiting & HR) that's really in demand (the dozens of content factories in our industry reliant on (mostly) unpaid guest contributions) and then working to align professional value prop with personal goals and company objectives and partnering…</p>
<p>Jerry - Yes, in fact, the model upon which I work as an editor IS building a talent pipeline. I've done both marketing and direct sourcing, and essentially, both involve finding someone with a pretty niche skill set (quality writing about recruiting & HR) that's really in demand (the dozens of content factories in our industry reliant on (mostly) unpaid guest contributions) and then working to align professional value prop with personal goals and company objectives and partnering throughout the editorial process to provide feedback, direction and next steps.</p>
<p>It's just a little harder than building a talent pipeline because all needs are immediate, and unlike sourcing, it's very public - and unfortunately, unlike social 'pundits,' most hiring managers tend to do their trolling in private.</p> Did you actually say that the…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-20:502551:Comment:17831102014-01-20T20:15:41.300ZJerry Albrighthttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/JerryAlbright
<p>Did you actually say that the skills required for digging up "content" and marketing material are pretty much the same as those required for building a talent pipeline?</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Really? </span></p>
<p>Did you actually say that the skills required for digging up "content" and marketing material are pretty much the same as those required for building a talent pipeline?</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Really? </span></p> it was the wine fueled networ…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-18:502551:Comment:17829222014-01-18T00:37:46.352ZAmy Ala Millerhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/AmyAla
<p>it was the wine fueled networking ;) wish I was going to ATL!!! So jealous</p>
<p>it was the wine fueled networking ;) wish I was going to ATL!!! So jealous</p> Wait Amy it was not the wine?…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-17:502551:Comment:17827432014-01-17T20:58:17.018ZTim Spagnolahttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/TimSpagnola
Wait Amy it was not the wine? ; )
Wait Amy it was not the wine? ; ) You'll have a blast, Matt. Th…tag:recruitingblogs.com,2014-01-17:502551:Comment:17829032014-01-17T18:28:51.407ZAmy Ala Millerhttps://recruitingblogs.com/profile/AmyAla
<p>You'll have a blast, Matt. The networking alone made it worthwhile.</p>
<p>You'll have a blast, Matt. The networking alone made it worthwhile.</p>