Morning! What’s your policy for paying recruiters commission on their placements after they leave your firm given the delay in payment from clients and the hire guarantee period?
How do you establish such a policy?
Tags:
I can't see how an agency owner would even CONSIDER not paying a recruiter for a placement they made.
Of course you would want to wait for all guarantee periods, etc. but just how often do you have an issue during that time frame? I think I have once.
Dear agency owners that are wondering if they have to pay the recruiter who left money on the table: Yes, you do.
Kerry: Regardless of what you read here, can I suggest that any policy complies with your state's law?
Some here have given you advice that's just wrong. New York is pretty clear on "commissions after termination" issues.
http://www.ebglaw.com/files/38064_ClientAlertArbeeny.pdf
This is a New York court appeal that ruled in favor of a plaintiff against a search firm specific to commissions after termination.
In New York (where I work) : I am typically owed my part of the commission if I participated in a successful placement (survives the guarantee period, less any draw or other fees) regardless of my state of employment with the search firm. If your agreement doesn't align with state law, you may run into problems. Safest advice: have an employment attorney give you a legal opinion on your agreement if you have any concerns.
If you have a "commission after termination" issue now that is not specifically addressed in your agreement: pay what was earned.
Good luck.
Jerry:
Although I agree with you ethically, owners only need to comply with their state's labor laws.
Most states address "commissions after termination" issues and some here would do well to see if their policy complies with their state's labor law.
And owners that knowingly pocket someone else's earned commissions already know that they are nothing more than thieves.
Jerry Albright said:
I can't see how an agency owner would even CONSIDER not paying a recruiter for a placement they made.
Of course you would want to wait for all guarantee periods, etc. but just how often do you have an issue during that time frame? I think I have once.
Dear agency owners that are wondering if they have to pay the recruiter who left money on the table: Yes, you do.
Some here have given you advice that's just wrong.
Daren, I'm curious - What advice are you referring to that is "just wrong"?
Amber: that some owners, based on their advice, are not in compliance with their own state labor laws.
You pay as to what the agreement/contract states. All knew what the game rules were when they signed up. You don't change the rules in the middle of the game. By all means make sure it complies with State law. We did.
Daren J. Mongello said:
Amber: that some owners, based on their advice, are not in compliance with their own state labor laws.
Based on her questions like "How do you establish such a policy?", we can assume that there was no agreement/contract was in place. If there are no agreements, then following state law is best practice.
Steve N Odell said:
You pay as to what the agreement/contract states. All knew what the game rules were when they signed up. You don't change the rules in the middle of the game. By all means make sure it complies with State law. We did.
Daren J. Mongello said:Amber: that some owners, based on their advice, are not in compliance with their own state labor laws.
Sounds like that. Always have an signed agreement so everyone knows the expectations. You wouldn't even work with other recruiters outside on splits w/o one.
Daren J. Mongello said:
Based on her questions like "How do you establish such a policy?", we can assume that there was no agreement/contract was in place. If there are no agreements, then following state law is best practice.
Steve N Odell said:You pay as to what the agreement/contract states. All knew what the game rules were when they signed up. You don't change the rules in the middle of the game. By all means make sure it complies with State law. We did.
Daren J. Mongello said:Amber: that some owners, based on their advice, are not in compliance with their own state labor laws.
I very much appreciate the time and expertise of everyone who has contributed in this discussion. I am pleasantly surprised at the robust nature of the discourse. I am also a bit taken aback by the fact that I am working at my third agency in my recruitment career and very few of the suggestions and policy initiatives that any of you suggested are in my current or former contracts with the agencies. I particularly appreciate the guidance from Daren regarding the NY State appellate ruling. I am including the link again because I think it is valuable.
As per Daren: http://www.ebglaw.com/files/38064_ClientAlertArbeeny.pdf
This is a New York court appeal that ruled in favor of a plaintiff against a search firm specific to commissions after termination.
First off, that should be clearly stated in a persons employment contract before he/she starts. Pay the full amount within a day after the guarantee period is completed, no excuses!
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
1801 members
316 members
180 members
190 members
222 members
34 members
62 members
194 members
619 members
530 members
© 2024 All Rights Reserved Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
With over 100K strong in our network, RecruitingBlogs.com is part of the RecruitingDaily.com, LLC family of Recruiting and HR communities.
Our goal is to provide information that is meaningful. Without compromise, our community comes first.
One Reservoir Corporate Drive
4 Research Drive – Suite 402
Shelton, CT 06484
Email us: info@recruitingdaily.com
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below