Tags:
casey - let me get this straight.. you announce your intention to leave the company to go start your own show, and THEN you start making demands about what the company you are leaving must do regarding commissions for placements that hadn't closed yet, AND you expected to get paid by the company you no longer worked for when the deals closed?
No offense, but you have some interesting expectations.. With no written agreement, the owner just patted you on the head and sent you on your way. Not that anyone would ever sign an agreement like that in the first place - Why on earth would anyone do any favors for someone who will hurt them financially in the near term by leaving, and in the long term by competing?
Maybe she was your friend and you trusted her, but you have to be realistic - the concept of fairness isn't even found in the bible, much less practiced by emotional humans faced with losing their moneymaker.
best thing is to orient yourself to winning, and beating your former employer in the marketplace.
Casey-- where were you working that was giving you 50% commission???? I want to work there!!
It's pretty well known throughout the recruiting business (or other industries, for that matter) that you don't receive commissions after you've left the company-- unless there's a signed contrcat stating otherwise. I'm sure you're kicking yourself for not hanging around your former company for a little while longer, huh??
Commissions are governed by the contract or state wage law or both. You may be able to make a wage claim for earned, but unpaid, commissions with your state's labor board. The agency will look at any written agreements you had as well as state wage law.
If there isn't a written agreement or policy that the employer provided to you, then state law will apply. Most states have some type of law that provides for the payment of earned commissions after an employee leaves. The factors that matter are the employee's salary structure-- mostly salary, mostly commissions or a combination, and the influence the employee had in making the sale/placement.
If you can show that a large part of your compensation depended on commissions and that the placement was due to your work, you may be able to collect part or all of the commissions.
But before you file a claim, also consider that making the claim will effectively burn any bridges with your former employer and potentially your former clients. You will need to call the employees who were placed to give testimony that you were the reason they went to the agency and that you were a substantial factor in the placement. Getting served with subpoenas to attend wage hour hearings will not make the candidates you placed or your former clients who hired them happy.
So while there may be a remedy, please consider the cost of pursuing it on future business as well as your own mental and emotional well-being in staying embroiled in the past relationship.
Casey - this really is a bummer. I've seen all kinds of stuff over the years. Usually it's just a few thousand bucks going one way or the other - nothing like this.
Sorry to seem skeptical here - or maybe just a bit more inquisitive - but 102K in fees on 2 placements is alot of money in anyone's book. So the folks you are/were placing are in the 250K salary range?
When I left my old agency I realized I would not be getting paid ongoing commissions for the contractors I had in place at the time - but I would not have left 50K on the table.
Are we missing something? What made you decide you had to leave (right then) with some great sendouts on the books? I am just not seeing how a Senior Recruiter - negotiating 250K salaries for executive roles - would be so up-in-the-air about what to expect on this stuff.
I am now puzzled......
Jerry-
I work with top tier attorneys in NYC and they make a lot of money. I worked at my former firm for a long time. I trusted my employer and we were supposedly friends. I would have stuck around to earn the money but I didn't want to take advantage of her by just hanging around to get the placement fee. I thought that would be a slimy thing to do. So, we agreed that if the few people I had in play (because of the economy it wasn't that many but the few were quality) closed within a reasonable period of time she would pay me a partial commission. Usually I get 50% but it was implied she'd reduce it by a certain TBD percentage since I would have already been gone.
Oh well....I'm much poorer but I would NEVER cheat someone out of money they earned and money I said I would pay. People are crazy when it comes to money.
Jerry Albright said:Casey - this really is a bummer. I've seen all kinds of stuff over the years. Usually it's just a few thousand bucks going one way or the other - nothing like this.
Sorry to seem skeptical here - or maybe just a bit more inquisitive - but 102K in fees on 2 placements is alot of money in anyone's book. So the folks you are/were placing are in the 250K salary range?
When I left my old agency I realized I would not be getting paid ongoing commissions for the contractors I had in place at the time - but I would not have left 50K on the table.
Are we missing something? What made you decide you had to leave (right then) with some great sendouts on the books? I am just not seeing how a Senior Recruiter - negotiating 250K salaries for executive roles - would be so up-in-the-air about what to expect on this stuff.
I am now puzzled......
Heather,
interesting advice to give casey regarding 50/50 splits are related to partnerships.. what was this based upon? had you seen his contract? what exactly were you able to make deduction? and was this also based upon New York Law, which i assume the contract would be based in? as that is Casey's residence..
I guess you are also familiar with NY business contract law right? of course you must be, to give that advice.. but it was an interesting perspective, .
Casey please help clarify - since a commission is not a split there may be some confusion, were you paid straight commission, draw against commission, or salary and commission, in an employee type relationship?
or were you splitting placements, because you had your own company? which changes the whole dynamic.. I am assuming you were an employee since you said boss? is that correct..
Have always learnt that one should Never assume the obvious is true..
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
1801 members
316 members
180 members
190 members
222 members
34 members
62 members
194 members
619 members
530 members
© 2024 All Rights Reserved Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
With over 100K strong in our network, RecruitingBlogs.com is part of the RecruitingDaily.com, LLC family of Recruiting and HR communities.
Our goal is to provide information that is meaningful. Without compromise, our community comes first.
One Reservoir Corporate Drive
4 Research Drive – Suite 402
Shelton, CT 06484
Email us: info@recruitingdaily.com
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below