Just curious. I placed a candidates who had one in 2005. He had about 200 patents and was the leading scientific authority in a multibillion dollar marketplace. Still waiting for the next one. I was pretty thrilled with the fee (which we discounted to $151,000), but it's more common than I thought.
One of our quieter new employees let us know that she had closed a deal with a $200,000 fee. So, what's the best way to make it happen more often? Seems like it could be worth discussing.
Tags:
"candidate" should be singular
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
1801 members
316 members
180 members
190 members
222 members
34 members
62 members
194 members
619 members
530 members
© 2024 All Rights Reserved Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
With over 100K strong in our network, RecruitingBlogs.com is part of the RecruitingDaily.com, LLC family of Recruiting and HR communities.
Our goal is to provide information that is meaningful. Without compromise, our community comes first.
One Reservoir Corporate Drive
4 Research Drive – Suite 402
Shelton, CT 06484
Email us: info@recruitingdaily.com
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below