Given the ridiculous fees and obstacles created by LinkedIn over the past 3 years; Would an alternative site that was designed to be more open (with recruiting in mind) be something that the larger talent acquisition community would support? I would love to hear what other think on this topic.


Cheers, Jason

aka Recruiter-At-Large

Views: 1092

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

As networks become larger, there is a need for narrow focussed groups or networks. ( is a good example)

Here is an interesting article on alternatives to Facebook


The problem with LinkedIn is they haven't figured out how to monetize their content. They do have a TON of content, both from the exhaustive profiles of job seekers and recruiters, and their status updates. Yet their revenue model is based upon subscription services- not as dynamic as something like targeted ads (like FB) which they could have done (and may still do).


They must make money somehow, so right now it's charging for subscriptions. Maybe that will one day change.

What we will start seeing very soon are niche networks that do a much better job of connecting with quality candidates, similar to the spin offs that we have seen in job boards. And, there are lots of better ways to monetize this than charging for Inmails (way too limiting).  And now charging the job seeker - if you haven't noticed see

It is kind of defeating the whole idea of a "social" network. Would you go to a BYOB party that also had a cover charge.

I suspect, now that they are a public company, that LinkedIn are going to squeeze even more out of recruiters.

Excellent questions and answers!

As an alternative/addition to LinkedIn, all members are cordially invited to! is a social network for job-seekers, recruiters and HR professionals... and it's absolutely FREE.

Check out Jobsonica and give it a try now


Thank you,







PS: Remember to join (Like) our fanpage on Facebook



Jason Elkin said:

Exactly. And given that we (recruiters) are 80%+ of their revenue stream don't you think that they might want to make it a bit more cost and user friendly to us? Or maybe they suffer from the same pride that had a few years ago? 


I think that as a profession we owe it to ourselves to explore alternatives and not simply give into a standard that we had little influence in shaping. 

LinkedIn and nearly every media outlet that covered the IPO expressly stated that recruiters are the primary (if not only) revenue source for LinkedIn. 


We need an alternative.

Reply to Discussion



All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.

Just enter your e-mail address below


RecruitingBlogs on Twitter

© 2024   All Rights Reserved   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service