Search Results - should-have deals

Comment on: Blog Post 'Is The Ladders Giving Recruiting A Bad Name?': winner.) B. Those folks earn or should have earned over 100K so big deal they can afford it. (why will they take resumes of people at 75K with the justification that they might be worth 100K) C. 100K up earners should know better because they make that much money. D. If 100K earners get ripped off they will probably not say anything because they should have known better. E. They might luck out and get a job. Do we justify taking jobs under or over 100K off of other job boards and company/recruiter sites then charging people to see them because: A. Indeed and simply hired do it so what is 30 bucks to have them in one place. B. They can't know if they are 100K because not many recruiters or companies put salary ranges. So if there are any on there that are below their advertised range of 100K only jobs they just missed the estimate and really they should be based on the job description. C. HR people and recruiters don't have anything to do but damage control because people are mad when they find out the jobs have been filled for years or are under 100K. So what? Big Deal? The recruiter or the company may have made a good contact since we lied for you. End Justifies the means? D. Jobseekers are not sophisticated enough to do a google search so it's ok. Are we all so damn dumb that we think they give a flip about jobseekers, recruiters or companies other than we are and we supply their inventory. There are a lot of us so if some think they are crooks not all will. Spin big, they need volume. They will throw money at your little group or your event. Are we so naive that we really think they have much interest in what any of the group that went to New York had to say. It was…; Added by Sandra McCartt at 6:17pm on February 24, 2011

Comment on: Blog Post 'The Culture Interview 101': 1) You don't need to get along with a lot of people here, largely just the ones you deal with day to day. 2) The less actual face-time you have with someone, the less they have to "fit in", e.g.while someone might not be tolerable around you 40 hrs/week, they might be tolerable around you 16 hours/week. This is "another good argument for maximizing tele-work. 3) If people are only going to be there for a few years (and realistically in most dynamic orgs. that's likely to be the case), it matters less how they fit in for the "long haul"- we live increasingly in an ii'll be gone, you'll be gone, let's do the deal" world. 4) The presumptions that the culture you have (aka: the way the founders want it to be) is the way it should be and that it's how it should remain in the future as the company grows and adapts are both dangerous to make and probably false. 5) What the words say and the actions that result from them are often far apart. Cheers, Keith Consequently, time, money, and effort devoted to C'orporate culture" could mo …; Added by Keith D. Halperin at 12:45pm on April 21, 2014

I was shopping at a wholesale warehouse this weekend and it got me to thinking about how the warehouse shopping mentality has grown exponentially in the past few years.

And it’s a good…

Added by Bonnie Brooks at 11:49am on January 14, 2013

Blog Post: Tips for recruiting people for NGOs: If you run an NGO and you want to recruit people for the NGO, it is important to be careful because you’ll have to be smart with the decisions. Remember that it is an NGO and you cannot afford to…; Added by Madeline Wallace at 2:47am on January 8, 2018

Comment on: Blog Post 'What It Is: The Latest Online Recruiting News Roundup': g on the deal that due to their low share price (I think the word my source used was 'depressed') this is a move to try to consolidate its shares is as a first step towards a private equity buy out and a delisting of DHX. The firm working on this deal is Archer, and they met with the C-Suite in DHX's New York office with their management team just before the holidays; I understand it's currently undergoing due diligence. This comment is made without fact checking this source, however, and should probably not be used for investment purposes. That said, it's interesting.…; Added by Matt Charney at 9:20am on February 4, 2014

Blog Post: The Client Side - Government Intervention, Penske, and How Things Should Be: This past week it was announced that Roger Penske's company was buying Saturn. This is what should have happened, but not orchestrated by the government and it should have happened months ago. The…; Added by Todd Kmiec at 11:34am on June 6, 2009

Blog Post: William Almonte - What Recruiters Want From You?: In the focused universe of business, in the event that you need to make your place secure and fruitful then you need to keep contact with the selection representatives. In the event that you can…; Added by William Almonte at 1:13am on February 19, 2018

Blog Post: Sony, AMD agreements may help rebuild image

By Mike Freeman

UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

Is video compression outfit DivX finally shedding the lingering taint of being tool…

Added by Michael Krug at 12:48pm on January 22, 2008

Comment on: Blog Post 'They Shoot Recruiters, Don't They?': think that first and foremost good recruiters are deal makers and when you're doing a contingent search the drivers are complete the project and get paid. You have to assume the client has at least a modicum of interest in ensuring they actually hire the correct person.…; Added by David Perry at 4:40pm on March 19, 2010

Comment on: Topic 'Can we stop "Salesmen" ruining our reputation?': olleagues with as much respect that we expect from them. The ones who are way out in left field will at some time burn all their bridges to isolation...problem solved. The old adage is still true (see above)…; Added by Daniel J Smith at 5:34pm on September 26, 2011