Chris Fields - @New_Resource - was my guest yesterday on The Recruiting Animal Show
I had some problems logging into my show yesterday so there might be a delay on the recording before the show begins. Also, sorry, but Chris called on a lousy phone.
I should note that I also had award-winning guest, Amy Ala back for her third appearance on the show. I asked Amy to come on to counsel me about dealing with job hunters who approach recruiters for help at funerals and other social occasions.
After 10 or 15 minutes I thought we had covered the problem and I ended the show -- much to Amy's chagrin. She said she had a lot more to say. But I didn't know. You see, I've started scheduling two guests for each show and I've been trying to focus each guest on one issue.
I intended to discuss only one issue with Chris, too. But I had read many of his blog postings so when we finished one topic with lots of time left in his segment I just moved on to another. In fact, I should have kept him on longer than I did.
I hadn't reviewed any other issues for Amy so I wasn't ready for more discussion after a quick resolution of the intended topic.
So, I need to schedule three guests in the future or plan to discuss multiple topics with each of two. Sorry, Amy. But give me a break: you're back very soon.
I think the wrong questions about diversity were asked in the show. Diversity is not important because a Greek programmer is "better" than a Russian programmer, it's important because programming (or other) talent is *independent* of ethnicity (or gender). If all your programmers (or other staff) are of the exact same background, it can be an indicator you're unintentionally self-selecting on a criteria (familiarity, in-network membership, etc.) *other* than talent. Companies should seek to mine better talent with objective criteria (testing, other assessments) rather than subjective (I know so-and-so, so-and-so went to the same school as me, so-and-so is just like me). Diversity itself can lead to diverse viewpoints, which is valuable in and of itself, but the real concern is ensuring that you're costing yourself better employees by selecting from a biased pool.
"...ensuring that you're NOT costing yourself better employees..." in that last sentence!
You all are just a bunch of nuts....BUT, I love you all. Now, back to my regularly scheduled programming....
Mike you think this broadcast was nuts listen to yesterday's replay...
Comment
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
1801 members
316 members
180 members
190 members
222 members
34 members
62 members
194 members
619 members
530 members
© 2024 All Rights Reserved Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
With over 100K strong in our network, RecruitingBlogs.com is part of the RecruitingDaily.com, LLC family of Recruiting and HR communities.
Our goal is to provide information that is meaningful. Without compromise, our community comes first.
One Reservoir Corporate Drive
4 Research Drive – Suite 402
Shelton, CT 06484
Email us: info@recruitingdaily.com
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
You need to be a member of RecruitingBlogs to add comments!
Join RecruitingBlogs