After combing through countless books, articles, and various online posts - the #1 reason for people leaving a company is their direct boss. Bosses have the ability to change, enhance or ruin a work environment. And they can do it quickly. So if bosses are the number one reason, why do we have so many poor ones? Training. Let me put it better, the lack of training. Bosses, leadership, or management - however you describe the people that oversee your day to day life; are the glowing star in the sky that keep you happy or are the gloomy cloud that hovers over your head and forces you out. Which one do you have?
For the bosses reading this article, TAKE NOTES. There are various foundational elements that cross all borders of management. Whether a factory manager, a shift lead in a fast food company, or an manager at a FORTUNE 100 - the basics remain the same. So take a quick look at why the people say they leave and then we can discuss how to solve the issue. Professional staff members leave due to the way they are treated - something that has little to do with their duties. How the manager looks at them, speaks to them, associates with inside/outside the office, encourages them, etc. all were the largest factors when determining how an employee evaluates a boss. If you do not think these factors matter, look at this. One of the reports written states that 75% of employees site their direct manager as the most stressful part of their day. So how does a manager truly manage people?
I believe that there is so much more to managing people than simply overseeing them in their tasks. The question is engagement, how does a boss engage the people he/she oversees is the real factor that makes all the difference. Engagement covers all the intangible interactions that we mentioned above and weigh the most on how staff assess their leadership. The old school thoughts are management up here and the rest of the people down here. If you are looking to keep losing people, remain in that school of thought - they will fall away in droves. Lack of engagement is the core foundation of the old school way of management. So why engage? People are people, one of the forgotten principles of management in today's business world. To influence people and get the job done, managers need to engage people. To do so, you must treat people the right way. Sounds simple enough - does it not? Why is it so hard then? In addition to change management, training, and the fear that all of those bring - technology is one of the single largest factors in the inability of managers to be able to engage. Email, phone, tele-conference, etc all remove the need for engagement and place people in isolated verticals without management training. All this equals people consistently ranking their bosses low in performance ratings and leaving their positions for "the grass being greener" on the other side.
Look for future articles addressing how to be better boss. Check out workfanatic for more information.
Jason-
I don't believe the term career is dead in this country, as I know there are people who want to be a part of something and make a contribution. I do believe a recruiting problem in finding or keeping the right people you need may come down to the story their being told by the recruiters. Selling people a "big picture sell", as I call it, comes down creating a scenario that makes people qualify for your program, instead of the company trying to qualify for their needs. It's tweaking the skill set of the recruiter to do a negative sell, taking the opportunity away from a candidate, and in the process making the candidate come to the job! Nothing new here, not just a skill set everyone been exposed to or used before.
Morgan - I understand what you are saying but career being dead I cannot agree with. Careers are all over the place, and they provide stability for a solid amount of people in this country. Are they as bloated with all of the benefits they were once before - no. But if people will learn to live within their means, stop demanding unrealistic pay for average work and understand that their jobs can go offshore, they would live in a more humble state of mind. One that would be less focused on money, more on performance and long standing stability, and that would translate to career opportunities vs. jumping from job to job.
AL - how true and the "take away" is something I use on all positions we have within the company. I tell all my team, sell people NOT to take the job. Even if they are the best technically, I want them to want this job - not a little, but a lot. When people sell against taking the job, paint a poor picture (within reason), and really explain the true picture vs. fantasy - the right people are hired. Mostly because they are the ones that really want to work for your company. Not simply people that just want a job.
Comment
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
1801 members
316 members
180 members
190 members
222 members
34 members
62 members
194 members
619 members
530 members
© 2024 All Rights Reserved Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
With over 100K strong in our network, RecruitingBlogs.com is part of the RecruitingDaily.com, LLC family of Recruiting and HR communities.
Our goal is to provide information that is meaningful. Without compromise, our community comes first.
One Reservoir Corporate Drive
4 Research Drive – Suite 402
Shelton, CT 06484
Email us: info@recruitingdaily.com
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
You need to be a member of RecruitingBlogs to add comments!
Join RecruitingBlogs