Search Results - equalling medium

Blog Post: Introducing Hiregrid Analytics: Easy, accurate analytics for your career site.

70% of Talent Recruiting Leaders…

Added by Joel McLean at 1:50pm on March 24, 2016

Topic: On Spam and Diamonds: ords, so I have offered the obvious rebuttal that I think needs and deserves to be made, in all fairness. Here is the article: http://recruitingdaily.com/why-its-time-to-can-recruiting-spam-forever/?utm_content=buffer65e9c&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer Here is my response (although I haven't double-checked my calculations, but the point is that an error of one magnitude [a factor of 10] would still result in the same conclusions): Generally-agreed upon facts: (1) The monetary value of ALL spam in the world per year is about $200 million <http: www.theatlantic.com="" technology="" archive="" 2012="" 08="" all-the-spammers-in-the-world-may-only-make-200-million-a-year="" 260814=""/> ; (2) the monetary value of Executive Search/Headhunting is about $20 billion per year <https: fred.stlouisfed.org="" series="" revef56131allest=""> ; (3) Email that is valuable and well-targeted is not SPAM. You are asking me to believe that email is not an effective recruiting technique because (1) you fail to define spam accurately, (2) have no idea of the value of recruiting email, which is many many times more valuable than actual spam, and (3) insist that it is worthless to readers and recipients. I totally disagree. Email is a great tool in any recruiter's kit. Whereas, what you are falsely implying is that viagra ads and so forth are the literary equivalent of job ads for Post-Doc students who will be earning $120K per year starting salary. The volume of "spam" generated by recruiters (which is not spam, but even if it were) is about 0.01% of all purported spam -- but has a value 100x the value of ALL the spam in the world combined. This means that the average recruiter email is worth 100,000x what a typical piece of "spam" email is worth. Calling a recruiting email "spam" is seriously similar to calling a diamond "a piece of carbon" -- superficially true, but neglecting the value of diamonds vs. other types of carbon. True, a diamond is carbon, but, by weight, is worth about the same as the ratio of the value of recruiter email to that of actual spam. For instance, a ton of coal is worth about $50, while a diamond is worth about $1400 per carat (a carat is a fifth of a gram). A pound is 453.6 grams, so a gram of coal would be worth 0.005 cents. The ratio of the value of a diamond to an equal weight of coal is 1400 divided by 0.001 or 1,400,000 to 1. So, yes, if you want to compare diamonds to coal; but isn't that really poor salesmanship? This whole recruiting spam conversation is nonsense, if merely because there is no precision in your use of words. Meanwhile, I've found email recruiting to be highly effective, and receive many compliments on my emails from extremely distinguished candidates, even when they are not interested in the jobs discussed in the email, but because they find my emails extremely informative. I've won multiple awards for my recruiting, and I've billed $5 million by now, with much success and acclaim. I guess I'm not buying your story, mostly because it isn't true. Maybe you just aren't any good at email recruiting.... I've certainly received a lot of 'crap' recruiter email myself, and I know what I don't like about it. But, my email is not like that, because I only represent the most interesting and exciting opportunities.…; Added by Nicholas Meyler at 11:15pm on January 2, 2017

Blog Post: UI/UX IN THE MOBILE INDUSTRY

There's really no way around it, people use mobile…

Added by Recruiter Raya at 3:34pm on March 23, 2016

Blog Post: How to Use Social Media Sites for Your Future Recruitment

s a HR recruiter, you certainly want to…

Added by Pallavi Chawla at 2:37am on July 3, 2017

Blog Post: Run These 3 Tests to Help Improve Team Alignment: How do we work best? It’s a question on every manager’s mind, but it can be…; Added by Ryan Mead at 4:46pm on April 22, 2015

Blog Post: The REKRUTR Vault: Why Big-Scope Sourcing Wins the War for Talent

When I worked in a recruiting agency it was very…

Added by Amy McDonald at 12:30pm on February 15, 2013

Blog Post: The Motley Fool Has The Best Career Site. Period.: The Motley Fool is a financial website that…; Added by Paul Petrone at 11:08am on December 5, 2014

Blog Post: The Cost Of A Vacancy: Added by Josh Mangum at 5:40pm on January 15, 2019

Blog Post: Women Get Things Done: The Rapid Rise of Female Tradespeople: There is no hiding that, until not too long ago, a faulty sink or a toilet that wouldn’t flush would have led to three certain steps: assess the situation, phone a plumber, and welcome an…; Added by Adam Johnson at 11:02am on March 23, 2022

Blog Post: Welcome to the Recruitment Content War: On #talentnet they raised the issue that since everything on Twitter is public, there's no way for a recruiter…; Added by ryanchartrand at 6:30pm on April 30, 2009