The Chicken or the Egg - the recruiters dilemma!

In a business world where communication is key, via websites, blogs, newletters, RSS feeds etc, recruiters are now more accountable than ever - not just to the companies that they provide a service for but also for candidates that they are interacting with every day. I therefore have a a nice question for all you recruiters out there that will get you thinking........ "Do you know who your clients are?"

In a sweepingly broad statement, recruitment organisations sit in two camps;
1. Client Driven (ie retained search). Specific targeted recruitment, aimed at finding well defined candidates. The clients engage the recruitment company and pay fees up front for this method (usually anyway!).

2. Candidate Driven (contingency | success only recruitment). Much larger volume based recruitment where it is focused on finding roles for the candidates. Payment is only forthcoming when the right candidate is found by the recruitment company.

So far you, as a recruiter can at least define which 'camp' you sit in. I think you would agree that in 1, the company that have engaged you are definitely your client. But with 2, is it the candidates you are working for or the companies who have vacancies that are your clients?

Just to muddy some waters here, just add to the mix the level of direct recruiting that is now going on with companies. They have been slowly (way too slow in many cases in my humble opinion!!) building their own direct resourcing capabilities, with the creation of Talent Pools of candidates interested in working for their companies. This change of focus has also been driven by the candidates themselves. Due to the level of information, career sites, Google, newletters etc candidates (especially the Y and soon to be Z generations - the employees of the future)) now actively target companies they want to work for themselves. They don't wait for recruitment companies to come knocking on their door with 'suitable' vacancies, they go and find these vacancies themselves.

So as a recruiter, who is more important to you - the companies looking for staff, or the candidates looking for a new job? They are both clients - but which one is your client?

Remember the chicken or the egg question?

Views: 59

Comment by Jerry Albright on March 13, 2008 at 7:16am
Obviously we "work" for both. If we had to pick just one - fr me the answer here is quite simple - the client paying for my services.

I might not fully agree with the 2 camps theory. We do recruit "directly" for most clients but are not (and do not wish to be at this time) retained. Most contingency firms are "client driven" as well.
Comment by Andy Headworth on March 13, 2008 at 7:28am
Jerry,
I agree - without both we couldn't function anyway.,
I did say that I the two camps were a broad sweep - there are of course many niches | sub sections | divisions that could be applied.
For the experienced recruiters like us then I guess this is more thought provoking than anything else, but for less experienced recruiters, 'who their clients are', is something well worth understanding.

I was also going to define the 'client' as the one that pays, but with contingency recruitment without the candidates there is no fee anyway. And when you have candidates that know that, shouldn't they be treated 'more like' a client because of their importance?

Andy
Comment by Jerry Albright on March 13, 2008 at 7:53am
This is all just too heavy first thing in the morning. :)

I treat everyone as if my life depends on it. (Because it does....)
Comment by Andy Headworth on March 13, 2008 at 7:57am
Sorry Jerry, I have the advantage of the time difference, being in the UK!!
We are all only as good as our last hire after all!!!

Enjoy that morning coffee!

Comment

You need to be a member of RecruitingBlogs to add comments!

Join RecruitingBlogs

Subscribe

All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.

Just enter your e-mail address below

Webinar

RecruitingBlogs on Twitter

© 2020   All Rights Reserved   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service