I don't buy all this "allowing Facebook access at work increases productivity" nonsense

Remember before all this online technology shenanigans when we just turned up to work - to work? Did we insist that we had access to Pac Man, Pong or Space Invaders, or any of the other trivial pursuits you care to name, during working hours? Of course not. Then, when the good old 'Messenger' came along - Yahoo, AOL etc. - and enabled us to chat with strangers at our will - did we insist that our new distraction of choice be installed on our PCs in the office? No. So why, pray tell, is there such a big beef about whether people should be able to access Facebook during their employers time?

OK, I get that some people's jobs demand it, but not everyone's job! It's not a given that when you go to work you should be able to access social networks at your will. And why should it be? I mean, hands up, who can honestly say they have Facebook and/or twitter on tap at work during the day and as a result are MORE productive? How? Take a look around you - on a train or a bus, in the street or a bar. People, hundreds and thousands of them tapping away furiously on their mobiles or laptops. "I've just got this badge" "I've overthrown Joe Schmoe as Mayor of Nowhereseville" "I'll be late home for dnner dear" etc. etc.  That's perfectly OK - in their own time but, give many of those people the same option in work time and surely, as much as some will argue it's down to people's own initiative, conscience and sense of duty to their colleagues to restrict the time they spend on social networks in the office, some of those same people will, through no fault of their own other than the fact that they can, end up spending far too much time doing stuff they shouldn't be doing as part of their job.

I challenge anyone to convince me that that is not the case. Indeed, I'm sure many of you reading this secretly know you delve into the depths of Facebook and/or twitter just a bit too much sometimes and that it does have some effect on your overall level of focus and productivity. The trouble is, like with any potential addiction, the potential addict is the last person to tell themselves there is an issue.

I've seen and heard of people in a work environment abusing their online access. Grocery shopping, chating with friends, browsing sports bulletin boards - the list is endless. It's also, I believe, in the majority of instances an unnecessary temptation. Never mind the employer employee stuff and making it a friendlier environment where people care and share. Human beings are crafty. Some also get obsessed and cannot help themselves. I say ban it unless you can justify it! (dons hard hat and awaits incoming)

Views: 586

Comment by Alasdair Murray on April 19, 2012 at 8:16am

...yes, in their current employers time no doubt in many cases. Use it, yes, of course, but unless it's a part of your job, outside of the workplace. (Just as well I'm not a tyrannical boss somewhere!)

Comment by Jerry Albright on April 19, 2012 at 8:38am

 

First things first Craig.  The majority of these "recruiting conferences" have now turned into rambling discussions about mobile phones, talent communities, the latest facebook fan pages, top 100 Influencers list, etc.  They have very little to do with actual "real world" recruiting successes.

 

 

So while I can certainly believe you've been to a conference - and you heard nearly everyone in the world "uses" social media in their job search - I recommend you dig a bit deeper and have THE PEOPLE PREACHING THIS show you MULTIPLE, RECENT EXAMPLES of doing so.

 

There is NO WAY that 60% found their current role through social media.  Absolutely no way.  Many of my clients have not hired even 1% through social media.  These numbers are made up.

 

I was participating in a discussion on ERE yesterday regarding some BS survey.  Here is the reply I added over there:

 

 

The Jobvite report alleges 16 percent of job seekers found their jobs through Social Media. It then goes on to list 18.4 million via FB, 10.2 million via Linkedin and another 8 million from Twitter that attribute their current job to the sites.

So – let’s add this up. That’s 36.6 MILLION PEOPLE claiming they got their jobs through just these 3 sites. So now, citing the previous number in the Jobvite report that 1/6 of job seekers found their jobs through Social Media – are we to believe that (36.6 million x 6) 219.6 million people got new jobs during this period of time?

This is all just ridiculous.

So while I realized recruiting conferences have their good points - don't feel obligated to believe everything you heard. Half (or more) of the content there is made up crap from people who are not even in recruiting.

Comment

You need to be a member of RecruitingBlogs to add comments!

Join RecruitingBlogs

Subscribe

All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.

Just enter your e-mail address below

Webinar

RecruitingBlogs on Twitter

© 2024   All Rights Reserved   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service