Search Results - totally

Blog Post: Virtual Career Fair: Definition, Best Practices and Case Studies: The unprecedented pandemic Covid-19 leading to worldwide quarantine has created a visible shift in how businesses operate. As the world’s entering the “New Normal”…; Added by Ngan Pham at 5:37am on July 23, 2021

Topic: Subsidizing Failure: How The "Big 3 Paid Billions to Keep Downsized UAW Members on Payroll": affing Industry exists. SUBSIDIZING FAILURE & CRONYISM Thank This Man for Destroying the American Auto Industry: Meet Ron Gettlefinger - UAW President. Yesterday the UAW refused to compromise on Bail-out negotiations to agree by the end of next year to wage cuts to bring their pay into line with Japanese car makers. The UAW refused to do so before its current contract with the automakers expires in 2011. As Senator Mitch McConnell stated yesterday: "This bailout doesn’t fix Detroit’s problem," he wrote, “It subsidizes it.” First it was Government forcing a quota system which influenced lending institutions to lend easy money to high risk groups to avoid being accused of red-lining communities. Then the Federal government removed the separation between commercial and private loans and created a securities market off of home mortgages that inevitably got bundled into junk debt. Then we had Senate/House Finance and Banking committee chairmen who avoided their regulatory oversight and defended Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and through their "Everything is Fine" press releases influenced stock holders to maintain their investments that would catapult them into portfolio ruin. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, then the banking system gets bailed out on the logic that they are a public utility system upon which the economy depends ... the handouts start, one after another, ... with little easing of the credit markets to show for the first 700 billion dollars. Now each and every industry argues before a Congressional committee why it deserves a bail out. All the while Capital firms freeze up, start ups wane, and Silicon Valley lays off thousands or freezes reqs to force attrition. At the end of the day, it means thousands of recruiters being laid off. Recruiters become the perceived luxury item in a world gone mad when all the while government intervention throws good money after bad policy. But there are reasons and they should be understood. At no time have so many special interests collaborated to create the perfect storm and under government fiat to proceed with such ill advised policy. Today, we focus on how the powerful United Auto Workers (UAW) collaborated with its political allies to undermine one of the last great industries of American manufacturing. This is a story about what happens when government and its policies attempt to guarantee outcomes. Unfortunately, it isn't a fairy tale. My public vote for the Big 3 to go into Chapter 11 to release themselves of UAW contracts otherwise we throw good money after bad if one of the primary causes doesn't get resolved. FACT LINKS: ** UAW Job Bank: Organized Slackers ** UAW Feels The Heat And Suspends Job Bank And Delays Trust Payments ** Job Banks - Protecting the people, not the jobs ** Congress targets UAW Job Bank as U.S. Car Makers fight for Loans ** Detroit Automakers, UAW To Spar Over Jobs Bank During Talks ** Will you shed a tear for UAW Job Bank employees when the loose their no show Jobs? Ford's Most Advanced Assembly Pant Operates in Rural Brazil TRIVIA TIDBIT: Did you know Toyota and GM sold roughly equal number of cars last year and GM went billions into debt while Toyota had a record year? ("GM versus Toyota: Someone is Doing Something Wrong") STRUCTURAL & IRRATIONAL RED INK: UAW & The Job Bank "We cannot continue to pay $65 an hour for someone to cut the grass and remain competitive. Miller meant, literally, "cutting the grass." Original Link WAYNE -- Ken Pool is making good money. On weekdays, he shows up at 7 a.m. at Ford Motor Co.'s Michigan Truck Plant in Wayne, signs in, and then starts working -- on a crossword puzzle. Pool hates the monotony, but the pay is good: more than $31 an hour, plus benefits. "We just go in and play crossword puzzles, watch videos that someone brings in or read the newspaper," he says. "Otherwise, I've just sat." Pool is one of more than 12,000 American autoworkers who, instead of installing windshields or bending sheet metal, spend their days counting the hours in a jobs bank set up by Detroit automakers and Delphi Corp. as part of an extraordinary job security agreement with the United Auto Workers union. The jobs bank programs were the price the industry paid in the 1980s to win UAW support for controversial efforts to boost productivity through increased automation and more flexible manufacturing. As part of its restructuring under bankruptcy, Delphi is actively pressing the union to give up the program. With Wall Street wondering how automakers can afford to pay thousands of workers to do nothing as their market share withers, the union is likely to hear a similar message from the Big Three when their contracts with the UAW expire in 2007 -- if not sooner. "It's an albatross around their necks," said Steven Szakaly, an economist with the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor. "It's a huge number of workers doing nothing. That has a very large effect on their future earnings outlook." General Motors Corp. has roughly 5,000 workers in its jobs bank. Delphi has about 4,000 in its version of the same program. Some 2,100 workers are in DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group's job security program. Ford had 1,275 in its jobs bank as of Sept. 25. The pending closure of Ford's assembly plant in Loraine, Ohio, could add significantly to that total. Those numbers could swell in coming years as GM and Ford prepare to close more plants. Detroit automakers declined to discuss the programs in detail or say exactly how much they are spending, but the four-year labor contracts they signed with the UAW in 2003 established contribution caps that give a good idea of the size of the expense. According to those documents, GM agreed to contribute up to $2.1 billion over four years. DaimlerChrysler set aside $451 million for its program, along with another $50 million for salaried employees covered under the contract. Ford, which also maintained responsibility for Visteon Corp.'s UAW employees, agreed to contribute $944 million. Delphi pledged to contribute $630 million. In August, however, Delphi Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Robert S. "Steve" Miller said the company spent more than $100 million on its jobs bank program in the second quarter alone. "Can we keep losing $400 million a year paying for workers in the jobs bank and $400 million a year on operations? No, we cannot deal with that indefinitely," Miller said in a recent interview with The Detroit News. "We can't wait until 2007." Guaranteed Employment The jobs bank was established during 1984 labor contract talks between the UAW and the Big Three. The union, still reeling from the loss of 500,000 jobs during the recession of the late 1970s and early 1980s, was determined to protect those who were left. Detroit automakers were eager to win union support to boost productivity through increased automation and more production flexibility. The result was a plan to guarantee pay and benefits for union members whose jobs fell victim to technological progress or plant restructurings. In most cases, workers end up in the jobs bank only after they have exhausted their government unemployment benefits, which are also supplemented by the companies through a related program. Workers go directly into the program and the benefits can last until they are eligible to retire or return to the factory floor. By making it so expensive to keep paying idled workers, the UAW thought Detroit automakers would avoid layoffs. By discouraging layoffs, the union thought it could prevent outsourcing. That strategy has worked but at the expense of the domestic auto industry's long-term viability. American automakers have produced cars and trucks even when there is little market demand for them, forcing manufacturers to offer big rebates and discounts. "Sometimes they just push product on us," said Bill Holden Jr., general manager of Holden Dodge Inc. in Dover, Del., who said this does not go over well with the dealers. "But they've got these contracts with the union." In Detroit's battle against Asian and European competitors that are unencumbered by such labor costs, the job banks have become a major competitive disadvantage. Breaking the banks Analysts say the jobs bank could be a bigger issue than health care in the 2007 contract negotiations, particularly at Ford. It has a younger work force than GM, meaning any workers Ford sends to the bench are likely to stay there for a while. "Ford is under pressure from investors to cut costs," said Roland Zullo, a research scientist at the University of Michigan's Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations. "At the same time, the unions are going to be under pressure to protect jobs." But does the jobs bank make any sense in a climate of shrinking profits and declining market share? While some might envy their life of leisure, workers like Cisco, 56, feel humiliated by the program. "I felt like I was useless -- like I was put out to pasture," he said. Most say they have no interest in retiring -- or spending the rest of their careers doing crossword puzzles. Classes are available, the workers said. They have been invited to take courses on bicycle repair, home wiring and poker. Silk-flower arranging is also available. READ MORE ABOUT HOW THE UAW & AUTO INDUSTRY ARE MAKING TAX PAYERS PAY THE BILL …; Added by Dave Mendoza at 1:05pm on December 12, 2008

Blog Post: How to Hire Employees in 2022 [Step-by-Step]: If you’re an HR manager or a business leader, one of the questions that probably keep you up at night is how to hire employees. Hiring has been on the rise based on a …; Added by Phil Strazzulla at 9:59pm on November 5, 2022

Blog Post: Why Use A Recruitment Agency - Benefits of using a Recruitment Agency for Employers: It’s no secret that for a substantial number of years the words ‘Recruitment Agency’ have perhaps been a little more than a tarnished phrase…; Added by Leigh Gillatt at 4:16am on July 19, 2019

Topic: Talent Talk Cafe - Chat Transcript for Community Take 2!: e together for a common good > giving back > where members get back more than they put in > creating and furthering relationships > respect > being - (this referred to presence and actively participating with awareness) > a web of inclusiveness > trust, and, > they must be intentional On Tuesday, June 17th we took the conversation forward to: Framing the community discussion around building a social networking strategy that begins by first establishing a deliberate community focus. So, given the guiding thoughts listed above on community, what steps would you take to design a talent community for recruitment in your business/industry? What are the most important actions a company needs to take to establish community? And, what should the expectations be relative to time to see a return on investing in building talent communities? Here's the transcript from our conversation and I hope you'll join us each Tuesday at 3pm ET/12pm PT for Talent Talk Cafe! Talent Talk Café – Susan Burns – Community #2 Susan Burns Hi everyone! Its time for Talent Talk Cafe!! 3:00pm Slouch Hey Susan 3:00pm Jerry Albright I'm in! 3:00pm MN Headhunter Word 3:01pm Slouch Hey Jerry and Paul 3:01pm Susan Burns Hi Jason, Jerry and Paul! 3:01pm MN Headhunter Susan, I cannot stick around for long and have something to share. Can I jump in? 3:01pm Susan Burns Our topic today is to continue the conversation around community but now move it towards establishing and growing a talent community 3:01pm Susan Burns Hi Paul - sure - go ahead 3:02pm MN Headhunter It tags on wthe topic.... 3:02pm MN Headhunter last week at a social media breakfast... 3:02pm MN Headhunter speaker talking bout ROI on social media.. 3:02pm MN Headhunter building communities... 3:02pm MN Headhunter I asked about how I should respond to ROI takes time and most will not wait long enough... 3:03pm MN Headhunter She said Reputation Management is instant. 3:03pm MN Headhunter If you can manage that right away other things will come in time 3:03pm MN Headhunter what do you think? 3:03pm Missed a little: Susan Burns Authenticity is something that evolves. How do you know instantly that its real? You can get a good feeling but ultimately what is important wi/building a talent community is emotional engagement and connection 3:08pm Jody Simon Hi there, I'm here too 3:08pm Susan Burns Hi PJ 3:08pm MN Headhunter so 8,000 is OK? 3:08pm Susan Burns Hi Jody 3:08pm Andrew Demske Hello from the Bay Area in Cali!! 3:09pm Slouch I think that if the talent network you build is real focused and the en result is hires, it does not need to be big 3:09pm Slouch 8000 is good 3:09pm Susan Burns What's so cool about what Jason has done on RB.com - and the essence of community - is that he's invested a lot to grow this and now the community helps him continue to nurture it 3:09pm Susan Burns Hi Andrew 3:09pm MN Headhunter Can a Forune 500 company build their own version of this 3:10pm Susan Burns Size doesn't always matter - no jokes ;-0 3:10pm Slouch i know that recruiters who place recruiters view this network as a focused talent community. some recruiters are having great success networking here 3:10pm MN Headhunter No this, but a site for CPA's as an exmaple? 3:10pm Susan Burns More important than size is engagement and what the community organizes around and shares out to their network 3:10pm Slouch absolutely 3:10pm MN Headhunter Could a Deloitte do their version of this for accounting people? 3:11pm MN Headhunter How long until it happens? 3:11pm Susan Burns Sort of like the difference between pay-per-click and organic search - ultimately more value is placed and received from organic search 3:11pm MN Headhunter (I want it now) 3:11pm Slouch you can;t have it now 3:11pm Slouch lol 3:11pm Susan Burns Paul - Re Deloitte or other companies - yes - they absolutely can - think how much there is to contribute in the CPA space 3:11pm Jody Simon the ultimate issue here as I see it is that in the corporate world they want to see real results, real fast and this is a process that takes time to build 3:11pm Susan Burns Jody - yes that is the ultimate tension point. Are there ways to show value as you grow community? 3:12pm Susan Burns Is there value contributed by the community that informs the brand and is that seen as value? 3:12pm Jody Simon it's something that I struggle with everyday 3:13pm Susan Burns Jody - what type of company/industry? 3:13pm Jody Simon I need to put aside time to build a network and to concentrate on branding and alternative recruiting methods while still filling open slots tha good old fashioned way 3:14pm Susan Burns So, its also about personal bandwidth? 3:14pm Jody Simon Raytheon Solipsys - mostly hard-to-find engineers 3:14pm Jody Simon definetely about bandwidth 3:15pm MN Headhunter I get that question all the time. I started slow. 5% of my time. It got to about 40% then I saw what I think was diminshed returns 3:15pm Susan Burns This is sort of the ultimate recruiting challenge - reallocating resources so that in time the investment returns more and you produce greater results and also have the time to further build the community 3:15pm MN Headhunter Now about 30% dedicated to social media stuff, recruiting, blog, here 3:15pm Susan Burns It can certainly become a time suck - is that what your implying Paul? 3:16pm Slouch i don;t know any recruiters who make more placements through blogs than they do good old fashion recruiting phone calls. 3:16pm MN Headhunter I think it needs to be balanced. In the beginning the return is lower. Takes time for search engine love 3:16pm Jody Simon most of my blogging, social media stuff, etc is done on my own time out of the office. it's the only way I can get it done 3:17pm Slouch But over time, the branding bit of it becomes something I think that phone calls can;t accomplish 3:17pm Susan Kang Nam Hello Susan.. hello everyone.. sorry I'm little late to join the discussion... 3:17pm Susan Burns Hi Susan - glad you could join us! 3:17pm Slouch and from that referrals come and that is the basis of any successful recruiter 3:17pm MN Headhunter Jason, I agree but I would say about 40% of my business comes from the blog by way of candidates or clients 3:17pm Andrew Demske good old fashion recruiting works best for now. i do think this will change though. i have made a few placements from Blogs and LinkedIn 3:17pm Susan Burns Jody - is there an "open to listen" from the company so they would see an investment period of at least 6 months? 3:17pm MN Headhunter but I have a very focused location and only in IT 3:18pm Jody Simon actually Susan, corporate recruiting is a time suck period! I quote you on that? 3:18pm MN Headhunter or as anonymous? 3:18pm Susan Burns Jody - what about it is the biggest time suck? 3:19pm Jody Simon they are open to most of what I suggest....so long as my #'s are in good shape 3:19pm Jody Simon and yes, you can quote me on that! Jody Simon the paperwork, the charts, plans, reports, etc, etc, etc....I fell like I never get to recruit anymore! 3:20pm Jody Simon gosh, I miss my agency life.....sorry to get you off track... 3:21pm Jerry Albright Talking about % of business doesn't quite put ROI into the correct perspective though, does it? If your overal #s don't increase? 3:21pm Susan Kang Nam having some technical problems.. but thanks Susan.. just reading through the discussion so far... 3:21pm Susan Burns Jody - a lot ofadministrative things that don't add value to where you really contribute? 3:22pm Susan Burns Jerry - can you say more about that? 3:22pm Jody Simon absolutely! Jerry Albright Or if your total production goes down? If you now hit 50% of your numbers from Social Networking, but are down in overall production? 3:22pm Susan Burns Jerry - sure - there needs to an overall benefit and improvement in results. How that is measured depends on the company - yes? 3:23pm Jerry Albright Anyone could achieve a percentage growth in any category. The real goes should be to increase your total #s, right? 3:23pm Susan Burns Has anyone seen or tested the idea of a "community manager" or strategic sourcer that is responsible for the online brand image 3:24pm Susan Kang Nam I am currently exploring both corporate vs. agency using web 2.0.. however curious to hear more about what works and what doesn't... 3:24pm MN Headhunter I ahve not seen a community manager in the career space 3:24pm Susan Burns What if you could reallocate $$ away from job boards and hire someone part-time just to support community efforts - how could that change the game? 3:25pm Susan Kang Nam We are currently testing that at the moment... with our online brand image... still in dsicussion..and exploration MN Headhunter Jerry, I agree. But there hard to measure benefits like speaking before a CIO group, quoted in the business section, and speaking to user groups that I did not do prior to this trek of mine 3:26pm MN Headhunter before I was a really good recruiter. now I am a really good recruiter with a brand, name, reputatin 3:26pm Susan Burns I introduced it at my last company and we saw an improvement that returend big $$ in savings through reduced time to hire 3:26pm Susan Burns So Paul - there's a shift in measuring value? 3:27pm MN Headhunter To some extent. I cannot measure right away the value of speaking before the CIO group. May not be able to know the true value ever 3:27pm Jerry Albright Right on Paul. We all track activity "forward" but very few track it "backward" to it's initial ingredients...... MN Headhunter Went to a tech event with 440+ attendees. local event... 3:29pm Rayanne that's a good ratio 3:29pm MN Headhunter Wore a blur short to the event...had people introducing themselves to me and that they read mys tufff 3:29pm MN Headhunter someone pointed out in my Twitter pic I am wearing a blue shirt 3:29pm MN Headhunter so everyone on Twitter in the local tech community recognized me 3:30pm Rayanne you have branded yourself 3:30pm MN Headhunter That was at least 25 people 3:30pm Susan Burns Hi Rayanne! 3:30pm Slouch if you look at WirelessJobs.com it's easy to see how that could become an incredible engine for making placements. 3:30pm Rayanne does that mean you can only wear blue now? 3:30pm Slouch built on Ning. target talent community with a recruiter running it 3:30pm Rayanne Hi Susan.. 3:30pm MN Headhunter I have branded myself by accident, the original intent of the blog was therapy, to work things out of my head and create free space 3:30pm Slouch Hey Rayanne 3:30pm Rayanne I udnerstand that kind of therapy 3:31pm Rayanne hey Jason' 3:31pm MN Headhunter I am going to white shirts now 3:31pm Susan Burns But also building an online brand can help move things along ore quickly because people have already identified with you 3:31pm MN Headhunter trying to grow the brand 3:31pm Andrew Demske lol 3:31pm Slouch that's the idea 3:31pm Jerry Albright Slouch - need a "pause" button on thing...... 3:31pm Rayanne more professsional? that IBM look? 3:31pm MN Headhunter but no tie. I am allergic 3:31pm Susan Burns Pauls taking on a MAJOR rebranding campaign! 3:31pm Rayanne wow... 3:32pm Claudia Faust Hi all 3:32pm MN Headhunter Susan, to your previous point, yes, doing the online stuff has moved me forward at a much quicker pace than pre blog in 2005 3:32pm MN Headhunter ties, not literally 3:32pm Susan Burns Hi Claudia 3:32pm Rayanne rebranding can be good - expanding your base even more 3:33pm MN Headhunter the thing is anyone can do it. That is my beliefe anyway. It just takes some time 3:33pm Rayanne Hi Claudia!!! 3:33pm Claudia Faust Hey there Rayanne! Susan Burns Paul - how long did it take before you started to see a measurable ROI? 3:33pm MN Headhunter 6 months from the blog 3:34pm Susan Kang Nam Hello Rayanne... hello Claudia.. 3:34pm MN Headhunter 10 days from Twitter 3:34pm MN Headhunter 2 months on MySpace 3:34pm Rayanne hey Susan KN... 3:34pm Susan Burns Paul - that's GREAT! 3:34pm Claudia Faust Paul, how do you measure the ROI? (hi there, Susan!) 3:34pm MN Headhunter 25 minutes on LinkedIn 3:34pm Susan Kang Nam I just joined Twitter today.. kind of curious.. how that works.. really.. 3:34pm Rayanne that is a quick ROI 3:34pm Slouch Paul, are you talking about making placements? 3:35pm MN Headhunter Jason, yes 3:35pm Susan Kang Nam that is quick.. 3:35pm Susan Burns Hi Claudia! Jerry Albright Isn't that a bit "old school" Slouch? 3:35pm MN Headhunter The blog was easy to measure because in the beginning I still had a business site 3:35pm Rayanne Isn 3:35pm Susan Burns Paul -that's also consistent w/ the time frame I experienced in-house for corp restructuring and restrategizing 3:36pm Rayanne Isn't what "old School"? 3:36pm Slouch Claudia, I still have the coupon you sent me 3:36pm Claudia Faust ROFL 3:36pm Claudia Faust frame it 3:36pm MN Headhunter everything now goes back to the blog so there is a base from which to work Susan Kang Nam interesting... 3:37pm MN Headhunter not interested in the job I am pitching? Want career information? go to the blog 3:37pm Claudia Faust Paul, I'm really curious to know how you measure ROI though. Is it number of contacts? revenues generated from those contacts? 3:37pm Slouch Jerry, is what old school 3:37pm MN Headhunter want information on the next local tech event? go to the blog 3:37pm MN Headhunter RSS feed if you like 3:37pm MN Headhunter sign up for the newsletter 3:37pm Claudia Faust ahh, got it. usan Burns in addition to placements do you also measure future placements - for instance those that are interested, qualified but just not the right time yet? 3:38pm MN Headhunter the thing is giving options, making accessible, rsponding promptly 3:38pm Claudia Faust and the end result to you is broader brand awareness? 3:38pm Jerry Albright Placements as a way of looking at ROI 3:38pm Jerry Albright Sometimes I'm a bit of a smart-ass..... 3:38pm Slouch I don;t know? 3:39pm Susan Burns Jerry - what would you want to measure? 3:39pm Slouch yes I know Claudia Faust this is an interesting topic -- Ami and I have been talking a lot about the ROI from social networking in a similar context 3:39pm MN Headhunter Jerry, I do agree with you. But prior to the blog I was a really small fish in the pond with no reputation 3:39pm MN Headhunter now people call me to do a search, looking for a job 3:40pm Jerry Albright Paul - I respect what you've done and your willingness to share! 3:40pm MN Headhunter I look at this way, I am spedning less time explaining who I am, wat I do, how I do it. Less time educating and more time building relationships 3:40pm Claudia Faust so the ROI does indeed lead back to your bottom line. 3:41pm Susan Burns Paul - what you've been doing is building personal equity and that is the ultimate goal in buidling a community 3:41pm Jerry Albright What I meant by the "old school" comment. Most social networking talk is about reaching out, building pipeline, etc. 3:41pm Slouch I think a core belief for any recruiter has to be wefind people for Jobs, we don"t help people find jobs 3:41pm MN Headhunter agreed 3:42pm Jerry Albright You rarely see mention of actually sending an invoice to anyone though that is our bottom line goal. 3:42pm Slouch don;t shoot me for that 3:42pm Maren Hogan Sorry SO late! I;d like to know how you deal with jason when people come to you for jobs?? 3:42pm Rayanne true 3:42pm Maren Hogan deal with THAT 3:42pm Rayanne true 3:42pm Susan Burns Hi Maren! 3:42pm Sateesh Yalamanchili I am new to this blog 3:42pm Susan Kang Nam hello... 3:43pm Maren Hogan Hi! Sorry so late! ACK! 3:43pm Susan Kang Nam hi Maren 3:43pm Jerry Albright Send them to the Employment Agency down the road..... 3:43pm Rayanne Hi Sateesh 3:43pm Susan Burns Maren - do u mean when a Seeker contact you about finding a job? 3:43pm Slouch they don;t come any more. I have not recruited for years but when they did, I would just say I don;t have any positions for what you are doing which was almost always the case 3:43pm Maren Hogan Okay so is that part of building community then? 3:43pm usan Burns Maren - do u mean when a Seeker contacts you looking for a job? 3:43pm Rayanne I think every contact has future potetntial even if they come to me... 3:43pm Rayanne You never know what position they will be holding or where they will end up next month. 3:44pm MN Headhunter I agree but I always try and give one idea, one referral out of courtesy. Part karma, part I do not know who they know that might one day come back to me 3:44pm Slouch Nope Maren Hogan yes 3:45pm Rayanne Maren has a point... that is not part of building a community 3:45pm Susan Burns chat tool is getting sluggish 3:45pm MN Headhunter sluggish = good 3:46pm Rayanne It boils down to respect and giving back 3:46pm Slouch its not how you build community but it's how you hit the numbers and make the placements most managers want to see 3:46pm Slouch just a recruiting observation. 3:46pm Susan Burns agree w/ rayanne - if u think about community how could this person also help you so its more a matter of deciding how much time to invest communicating with the person 3:46pm MN Headhunter and that is why I have been on my own this whole time 3:47pm Maren Hogan yep, you are all sayign what I am trying to say Rayanne I knew what you meant by your question, Maren. 3:47pm Susan Burns these same principles can work inhouse for corp recruiters. its a matter of building a compelling case and finding key partners/champions 3:47pm Maren Hogan In a small town like Omaha you can't just be all "sorry yo, can't help ya". It;s akin to saying you don;t know any of the big dogs plus it outs people off 3:47pm Rayanne definitely works for in-house 3:48pm Maren Hogan so I think part of building comm for me would be to build a relationship with an agency that would actually help these people 3:48pm MN Headhunter same here in Mpls. A big really big small town 3:48pm Maren Hogan thx rayanne! 3:48pm Susan Burns maren - you also don't know how connected that person might be - say they live in NYC and write a blog - all becomes part of reputation management and recognizing we are all one 3:48pm MN Headhunter I finally started doing agreements with non IT firms 3:48pm Rayanne I always think about who that person might know or where they might be 3:49pm Susan Burns Jodi - are you still here? 3:49pm MN Headhunter Susan, look at that. tied it all together after me going on a tangent for 48 minutes 3:49pm Jody Simon yes i am 3:49pm Maren Hogan that's true 3:49pm Rayanne tangents are good 3:49pm Susan Burns Paul - you're the Lewis Black of the recruiting world ;-) 3:49pm Rayanne rants are good.. \ Rayanne it starts conversations and points being made 3:50pm Susan Burns Jody - wondering what would help make the case for you internally? Where does the company see value? 3:50pm Maren Hogan HAHA--susan spot on! 3:50pm Susan Kang Nam great question.. 3:50pm Slouch Jody, what kind of engineers are you recruiting 3:50pm Jody Simon in its engineers only....we are run by our engineers 3:50pm MN Headhunter (sound of Paul going into convulsions) 3:51pm Slouch circuit design engineers? 3:51pm Jody Simon heavy duty systems engineers with DOD and C2 experience 3:51pm Susan Burns what do engineers value? is there a cost to not having enough engineers on the job andif so how much - can it be monetized 3:51pm Slouch how much do you py to agencies every year? 3:51pm Slouch pay 3:51pm Jody Simon if i can get engineering on my side then i win the argument hands down 3:52pm Rayanne SB, when I worked in-house I kept every résumé I received and made placements months later when new reqs came up... Jody Simon I don't use any agencies at all... 3:52pm Slouch what about the company you work for 3:52pm MN Headhunter Rayanne is my hero of the day 3:52pm Slouch if you dont mind me asking 3:52pm Susan Burns Rayanne - same here - we would mine our own database before paying to post a job - novel concept huh! and made hires that had applied a year ago or more 3:52pm Rayanne yep 3:53pm Jody Simon I am very close to having the engineers on my side. they want to use agancies and I want the recruiting function to grow internally 3:53pm Susan Kang Nam that's great Rayanne... 3:53pm Jody Simon my company doesn't use any agencies 3:53pm Susan Burns Rayanne - it was also about how we managed communication w/ them initially - big push on pesonal communication 3:53pm Rayanne true.. 3:53pm MN Headhunter Jody, how many of you are there? job to fill? Susan Burns Jody - maybe thats the open door - take the $$ they would invest in agency and see if they'll give u 6 months to show an ROI from community/social 3:54pm Maren Hogan Do you think that extra hire (resume hoarding whatev) is MORE useful in our current economy? 3:54pm Rayanne I spoke to every person that sent a résumé and made sure they knew me and the company they had applied to 3:54pm MN Headhunter Susan beat me to the punchline 3:54pm Jody Simon communication is the key with my company as well....the problem is that recruiting reports to HR and my boss puts up a fight 3:54pm Susan Burns Maren - extra hire and resume hoarding sound difft to me. extra hires always make sense if its the right extra hire ;-) 3:55pm Susan Burns So its HR that is the obstacle? Jody Simon I'm working on getting a champion for my cause and getting very close 3:55pm Jody Simon yes, HR is the obstacle 3:55pm Rayanne sometimes... and sometimes it's the hiring manager that wants to make that hire NOW 3:55pm Susan Burns Jody - that could take us another hour at least ;-) but to all of u who know how I feel about that obstacle - i rest my case for now! Maren Hogan aorry trying to come up with punchy title on the fly then had to get my hotdog--I meant whatever the name for Ray and Paul's and your database. . . 3:57pm MN Headhunter that if they have a relationship built, when the job order opens, they can hire rightaway 3:57pm Jody Simon Thanks Susan....always up for ideas...and helping others with my own ideas as well 3:58pm Susan Burns hey everyone - any thoughts or requests for next weeks topics? Maren Hogan critical foundational tools for the recruiting function 3:59pm MN Headhunter Susan = my new therapist 3:59pm MN Headhunter Maren, huh? 3:59pm Slouch im always open to a discussion about making this site better for everyone 3:59pm Maren Hogan so much theory thrown around and then to put into practice in the real world 3:59pm Susan Burns Ok Paul but I don't take insurance ;-) 3:59pm Maren Hogan what do we really need? 3:59pm Susan Kang Nam lol 3:59pm Maren Hogan Paul, I know I'm wordy, you'll learn to cope 3:59pm MN Headhunter will do some online wine shopping then 3:59pm Slouch with an accent 3:59pm Maren Hogan ha! 4:00pm Rayanne hmmm Rayanne I LOVE the live-ness 4:01pm Susan Burns a community? 4:01pm Slouch yah 4:01pm Maren Hogan I hate it. I usually have something in my teeth 4:02pm Rayanne that is a great idea 4:02pm Susan Kang Nam hmmm... 4:02pm MN Headhunter (sound of wheels turning) 4:02pm Rayanne no screeching 4:02pm Susan Burns that would be cool. could also then put togehter a few key steps to marketing it? managing it? 4:02pm Rayanne I like it... 4:02pm MN Headhunter by chance do you have an extra domain name? 4:02pm Susan Burns isn't that a great sound paul - it goes really good with wine ;-)! 4:02pm Slouch I can check. 4:02pm MN Headhunter or 100? 4:02pm Susan Burns i just established talenttalkcafe.com today - thanks to ami's reco 4:03pm Susan Burns u can use that if you'd like 4:03pm Maren Hogan so exciting! Really, i love IDEAS! 4:03pm Slouch I think we could easily build a site. the building is easy. its the maintaining but that is something else completely 4:04pm Rayanne this is great. 4:04pm Rayanne I am sure... 4:04pm Slouch same bat time, same bat channel 4:04pm Slouch susan, if you want, we can talk details in Portland 4:04pm Jody Simon thanks for sharing! 4:04pm…; Added by Susan Burns to Talent Synchronicity at 2:25pm on June 18, 2008

Topic: The Story That Needs to be Told - Part IV: e office. The company brought in two of the national training team members to work with her. One stayed a week the other was on assignment for several months. She ran the training classes with his assistance and was told that she was doing a great job. There was only one little glitch, a rep visited a winery brought back a case of wine and brought her a bottle. She thanked him told him she could not accept gifts and returned the wine. Later that day it was back in her office. She went immediately to her boss and told her he had given it to her, she had returned it , he had put it back in her office so would the boss like to have it or should she take it back to him and insist that he take it back. Her boss told her it was ok to keep it but to just be careful but it wasn’t a big deal since he was not on her team and he had given several other people in the office a bottle also. Of course 10 days later she was called in and told that it had been reported that she had accepted gifts from reps. My candidate reminded her boss that she had asked her about it previously but the bottle of wine was still in her office and the boss was welcome to it or she would now give it back. No not necessary, the boss had forgotten but now did remember so forget it. My candidate was contacted about three jobs that were being posted that would enable her to live in this area but work in another division reporting to another supervisor. She was thrilled as both would be a promotion and a raise and allow her to report to supervisors that she had worked with in the past that she liked. She applied and was told that it would be six weeks to two months before interviews would be held but received calls from the other supervisors encouraging her about the jobs she was applying for being a good fit for her. For her to be able to move into another position with the company her boss is required to release her and does have the ability even she is offered another position to say that she is not releasable due to business needs. My candidate was concerned so thinking that things had gone better for several months she went to her boss and told her that she was applying for the other jobs, she had enjoyed working for her, had learned a lot (no kidding) but wanted to advance with the company and needed as a single parent to make more money and be in a situation where she could take her kids to school and day care at a normal time instead of before 7:30 in the morning to be sure that she was in the office by 8:00 and be able to pick them up herself rather than have someone else have to pick them up as she did not get off until 6:00 with the after school program and day care closing at 6:00. Her boss told her that she understood but she did not want her to leave. She was irreplaceable, the boss was going to retire in a couple of years and she was grooming my candidate for her job. She would change her hours so she could come in at 8:15 and leave at 5:45 if my candidate were willing to work an extra Saturday a month. My candidate said she would appreciate that and would work the extra Saturday but she wanted to move up with the company, did not want the boss’s job and wanted to get out of the office environment that was not a fit for her as she did not feel and never felt that she fit with the management style and environment there. My candidate did not believe it was right to retaliate against people who filed a complaint. Her boss said, “I have told you we don’t retaliate if any of them file a complaint against us, it’s not legal but ,what we do is “work them out of the business , we just observe every move that they make until we have enough to work them out.” My candidate said , “yes I know and I don’t think that’s right, people make mistakes I feel like that is what has happened to me in the past and I don’t want any more of it. “Things have gotten better but I have always felt like you were going to fire me for something and I don’t want to live that way. You micro manage me, you undermine me, you tell me to fire a rep for attendance then after I do you bring them back and tell them that you saved their job so I have a problem with a rep. You make me uncomfortable talking about your sex life and talking about who is having an affair and I don’t think I can work for you.” At this point the boss started crying and sobbing and apologizing. She went on to say that “she was not a weak manager, she was not a weak manager she was just emotional and if my candidate would just reach over and rub her arm when she stared acting that way she would get control of herself. My candidate feeling that things were getting too bizarre and as she put it, “my stomach turned at the thought of having to rub her arm to calm her down.” , brought the meeting to a close by saying that she wanted to move forward with the other jobs and she hoped that the boss would not stand in her way. The boss dried her sloppy tears and said she would not stand in her way. A few days later the boss came in and asked my candidate to go for a drink with her after work. Not knowing what this was about as it had never happened and not wanting to go to a bar with the woman after the arm rubbing comments she said she would but had dinner plans with family so would only be able to stay a short time. They met at a bar. The boss told her that she needed her to stay as she was handling several vital parts of the business. She would change my candidate's hours, she would be flexible with her where her kids were concerned as she was the only single parent in the management group, she would give her more vacation, she was going to get an allocation for all manager raises and she would give her the full amount that she got for all the managers if she would not move forward with other jobs. My candidate told her she appreciated the offer but as she had discussed with her .she wanted to move into a different area of the company and she felt that if she got all of the raise allocation for all of the managers it would make the situation with her peers worse than it already was because she was not considered part of the group as it was. since her boss had taken responsibilities away from one or two of the other managers and given them to my candidate. A move that had not made my candidate a favorite with two of the other managers. My candidate made a hasty retreat from the bar and hoped that this would be the end of it. All was quiet for a week or two. On a Friday evening at a few minutes before 5:00 without any warning my candidate received in her interoffice email containing a boarding pass and reservations for a company trip to Columbia, South America to be part of a training team who would be onsite in Columbia for two weeks. She freaked, the national trainer she had been working with still on site. She went running to him and asked if he had requested her as part of the training team. He indicated he did not know anything about it but he was scheduled to go to Columbia so not to worry about it. He would be there he spoke Spanish and the training would be held in a hotel. She explained to him that she had two small children in school and no one available to keep them for an extended period of time. It was also a dangerous country and she would terrified to go there and was not going to go. On Monday she went to her boss, told her she had received the boarding pass and reservation. The boss looked at her and said, “Yes”. My candidate told her that she was not going to go to Columbia, she had no child care available for that kind of trip and further was terrified of going to a country that the State Department discouraged as a place for Americans to travel. She would quit before she would go. She asked the boss if she would go. The boss said no she would not. My candidate said she was not going so if she needed to clean out her desk she would do it. The boss said she would see what she could do. It went away, nothing more said. My candidate thought it was strange that her boss seemed to know about it and had not said anything to her before she received a boarding pass and confirmed reservation. Just strange. Two weeks later on May 4th my candidate checked the company site for the jobs she had applied for. She had three interview requests for the jobs and was very excited that finally she would at least have the opportunity to move on. Before she could send the acceptance her boss came in her office and said, “you need to come to the conference room, EEO in Houston wants a phone conference”. Thinking it probably had something to do with the refusal to go to Columbia off she went to talk with EEO. The EEO rep started the conversation by telling her that EEO needed to be sure that my candidate was not recording the conversation and did not have a cell phone with her or any note taking material. Then told her that they were investigating her entire management career. When my candidate asked why she was told that the EEO rep had been advised of a number of things and had never seen anything like this and that her boss had asked that her applications for other jobs be suspended until the investigation had been completed. Here is the list. EEO had been advised the following –My candidate's responses are in ( ) She had assisted male reps more than she assisted female reps. (Yes and had corrected) She had brought a fart machine to the office. (No she did not, one of her reps did, she told him it was funny but to take it home) She had used the children of reps to take care of her children. (No she had been asked about it because her boss was confused due to a same name of reps daughter and it had been clarified) She had lied to her boss about being late to work. (No her boss had changed her hours, it was on the schedule, when she came in one day another manager had asked her if she was five minutes late. She had popped off and said, nope 10 minutes early) She had accepted gifts from reps. (No, she had gone to her boss about the wine and her boss told her not to worry about it but the bottle of wine was still in her office.) EEO had received pictures from the wife or girlfriend of a male rep that the wife or girlfriend said were sent to her husband by my candidate. Several were full nudes both front and back one reflecting a tatoo and two were pictures of her with two little boys and in a car with her sunglasses on. (Holy God, she had received an hysterical call from this woman accusing her of having an affair with her husband. She had only seen the kid outside of work once, he was drunk and had come to their table. She and her date had left the place and gone someplace else. The wife had accused her of sending pictures to him. she had not but when asked what her email address was she had told the wife so if they had any nude pictures they were not of her , she did not have a tattoo. The guy had been called in and asked if he were having an affair with her. Had come and apologized to her about his wife calling both my candidate and the boss and additionally the wife had later called and apologized. But if there were pictures she wanted to see what they were because somebody was guilty of cyber harassment as the other two pictures where the ones that had been on her facebook page that had been up for a total of three weeks only in Dec. of 2009.) She had interfered with an investigation and had received a COBC violation. (The now infamous Christmas Play Caper. She told eeo that she had the meeting with the boss’s boss over that whole silly mess and when she received her evaluation there was no COBC violation. She was informed that in fact it was in her file and should have been on her evaluation.) She had made comments of a sexual nature regarding pop rocks. (Her team was to dress up like Halloween candy, they asked about lollipops. She had said , “no then the other teams will just say that we suck so pick something else” One of the reps had said what about poprocks. She had responded , “whatever that might be cute”. She didn’t know how that could be considered making a comment of sexual nature about Poprocks. EEO declined to explain to her the sexual nature of poprocks and I didn’t think I would go there either.) She had been losing weight in order to start a relationship. (She had been losing weight because she had gained back up to 190’s her doctor had put her on medication for high blood pressure and told her to get the weight off.) She had assisted a lesbian rep an inordinate amount of time to try and start a relationship with her. (No she wasn’t a lesbian anymore that she was a femme fatal having an affair with every male in the office. The woman was struggling and needed more help than some of the others.) She was a know it all. (She was the Subject matter expert on fiber for the office so if that made her a know it all so be it.) She had assisted a rep with filling out FLMA documents for claims he was filing after he had gone out. ( No, He was on her team, had back problems that required a sit down/stand up desk. He had asked to move it because he didn’t like the location. She had asked her boss if it could be moved. The boss had said, hell no ,it’s too expensive to move he can stay where he is. The guy had come to her asking what he needed to do to go out on FMLA. She had referred him to HR. He had filled out his own forms, she was his supervisor so had reviewed them signed them and he went out in Jan. She had not spoken to him since.) She was having lunches in her office with a trainer from the national group. (yes, she had two working lunches with the national trainer who was on site in her office. He was assisting her with training sessions so had gone out himself picked up lunch on two occasions and brought it back to the office so they could discuss any problems the reps were having with the way the training was being presented.) In a state of total shock my candidate went back to her office after this lovely encounter of the third kind. Before she could do anything but sit in a daze her boss walked in and said , “You are being put on paid administrative leave until EEO completes their investigation. I will need your badge and key card and I will walk you out.” My candidate asked if she could get her personal things ie; bills that needed to be paid in the next few days. She was told that her boss would see if she could get those things for her but my candidate would not be allowed to remove anything from her office and would need to leave NOW. It was just before noon. As she was walked out of the office in front of 170 people her boss marched behind her swinging my candidate's badge in a circle like she was a stripper, to make sure that everyone in the office saw that she was being walked out. When she was called by her boss later in the afternoon to find out when the boss could get some other pass key that she had at home she again asked if she could get her personal things. The boss said, “this is just administrative leave you don’t need to get all of them I will bring your bills to you.” On May 7th my candidate filed an ethics complaint through the company for sexual harassment, hostile work environment, bullying, retaliation and related the series of events to another company EEO representative. On May 9th my candidate filed a police report against the wife or girlfriend of the male employee for cyber harassment and sent a copy of the case number to EEO and a request for copies of the pictures they had, the dates they were sent who they were sent to and the headers of the emails from all correspondence relating to the pictures. She felt the woman was nuts and could be a danger to she or her children as she had no idea what the current status of their problems were and had not heard anything from the woman since early in 2010.On May 17th she was returning home in the middle of the afternoon and caught her boss driving slowly past her house. She lives on a dead end street with a cul de sac where the boss turned around and drove slowly by her home on her way out of the subdivision. Nobody can figure that one out. On May 18th my candidate was contacted by her boss to come back to work to discuss the results of the investigation. At that time she was told that she was being terminated for. 1. Releasing Proprietary Company information without a business need. 2. Creating a hostile work environment 3. Interfering with an Investigation. 4. Violating the code of business conduct in terms of honesty and integrity. When she asked for details as to what information , how she created a hostile work environment and what misconduct she was being accused of ,she was told that her boss would not discuss it but would send her a letter. She was asked to sign a document saying that she would not use her knowledge gained while employed at any other communications company and she would not take any legal action against the company. She refused to sign it. She asked if she could remove her personal things from her office. The boss followed her. My candidate smiled ,said hello to everyone who was calling out hello’s. Packed up her things in several boxes asked her boss to take an inventory and asked where her personal notebook and the copies of her personnel reviews were as they had been in her office. The boss denied any knowledge of either. My candidate looked at the woman and told her she was taking this to a higher level at which point the boss started crying and quit digging through things but did want to be sure that the highlighter my candidate was removing did not belong to the company. My candidate held her head up , walked out smiling at everyone told them she would miss them and good luck. As she reached the middle of the office people stood up and clapped for her. Some were crying. Two walked in and quit and walked out behind her. Five more have gone out on stress and two have quit since then. The next morning the boss received flowers with a card that said. “Congratulations, you finally got her, you must be proud”. A few days later she received a letter in a hand written envelope. It was from her boss stating that she had been terminated for: 1. Misconduct in the office/misconduct off the job 2. Creating a hostile work environment. 3. Helping male reps more than she helped female reps. 4. Interfering with an investigation. My candidate filed for unemployment. TWC requested information twice from the company as to the reason for termination. The company provided a copy of the employee handbook, a statement that an investigation had been done, she had exhibited a pattern of dishonesty, created a hostile work environment, helped male reps more than female reps and had interfered with an investigation. No details yet as to how she managed to do all that or what she did proximate to termination or what triggering event occurred that resulted in her termination. Her unemployment has been granted and made retroactive to the date that she was put on leave. She is now waiting to see if the company will appeal the granting of her unemployment with some kind of detail as to what she was found guilty of that triggered her termination. Her family has stepped up with financial assistance. She will not be able to move forward with the purchase of her home and will have to move within a month. She has enrolled in school to finish her degree. She has updated her resume and is moving forward looking for a new job. She is in fact brokenhearted at losing the opportunity to stay with the company in another position after spending all of her adult life fighting this mess to try and be a success as most of the people who worked for her and those she interacted with throughout the company felt she was. She has learned a lot. Not the least of which is to file an ethics complaint at the first sign of something like what she has been through with , in my opinion, a sick and toxic personality. As a recruiter of many moons experience I know that all I have heard is her side of the story and there are normally two sides to every story. I have done some fact finding with other employees without her knowledge. What she tells me appears to be backed up over and over by the people who have worked with her . Realizing that this is hearsay I share it with you as I feel this is a story that should be told. Oh, and she received a call two days ago in regard to the ethics complaints she filed. They left her a message that they were closing the complaint due to not being able to find enough evidence to substantiate her complaints. What a surprise. It is after all an employment at will state.…; Added by Sandra McCartt at 7:39pm on June 11, 2011

Blog Post: From Average to World-Class: A Checklist to Transform Your Onboarding / Orientation Programme - Jobsabode.com: World-class is a term that is often used and misused by those in human resources. It's important to realize upfront that good or even very good onboarding programs are quite common, but they are also…; Added by Jobsabode.com at 6:24am on August 7, 2008

Blog Post: <a href="http://Intelli-Source.com">Here are a few of our current candidates:</a>: We would be very interested in doing some split business!

Intelli-Source, LLC is a full service recruiting firm that specializes in key positions for the healthcare arena.

We are not…; Added by Rick Whitley at 10:14pm on August 27, 2008

Blog Post: Recruitment Strategy Development - Impressive Interviewing: You can imagine what a daunting task it is to write a blog on a topic that has generated enough books to pave the way from St. Louis to San Diego. However since this blog is another in the series of…; Added by Bill Humbert at 2:30pm on October 5, 2009