Here’s the recruiting scenario:
An executive search firm principal (let’s call him Jack) searches for and sources potential prospects via LinkedIn
Jack finds and contacts a potential prospect (let’s call her Jenny) through inMail
In his inMail message Jack introduces himself, his search firm, and briefly describes his client’s opportunity to Jenny
Jenny politely replies to Jack that she would be open to discussing the opportunity and provides her contact info and availability for a call
Jack calls Jenny the next day and leaves a voicemail and also emails her the official job description
Jenny is unable to return the call by end of day (for Jack’s time zone – 3 hours ahead), so she emails Jack to thank him for the additional information and let him know her availability for a call the next day
The following day, Jack replies to Jenny’s email and requests her resume
Jenny thinks Jack is a JackHole
Jenny’s recap (recruiter rant) of the scenario:
Resume THIS you typical jerkface recruiter! You found me on LinkedIn, liked what you saw enough to contact me, presumably to speak with me, so why do you suddenly need a resume in order to do that?
Don’t jack me around Jack!
(BTW: Jenny's LI profile is comprehensive, so her resume would be redundant at this stage)
Well, I work in digital media, so lack of an online presence is usually not so bueno. Your experience may vary, as always.
I don't think it's unreasonable to professionally and politely ask for someone's resume who's indicated they're open to an opportunity, aka (haven't bothered to "opt out" of the default setting). I don't want something to "start a conversation"- I want something to send to a hiring manager STAT.
Cheers,
Keith
If the scenario happens as written in this post, I don't think it was so out of line. But if I don't have the resume and we haven't had a chance to talk (even if I did call when they requested and got voice mail), I would probably just ask for it during our call if things were going along the right lines. I rarely see a LI profile that is as comprehensive as a resume, though.
I've never had anyone seem put aback or express anger/irritation, etc. when I ask for a resume - I hope I haven't secretly been pissing off a bunch of people!
Pete Radloff: Well said. I wonder why it is that I am so lucky that I never have that problem, though (of candidates saying that they have a resume on LinkedIn and won't provide anything else). I haven't had that happen for at least a year, if not eighteen months. It used to happen to me when I was a first-year recruiter, though. I used to write resumes for candidates who didn't have one... I haven't had to do that for 25 years. I think that if you are working with a more professional level of candidates, they understand the need to 'jump through an occasional hoop'. Insisting on working only with motivated candidates is actually a good idea for a recruiter. Giving a candidate too much power, leeway, etc. rarely works. My opinion, of course.
Different recruiters have very different styles, sometimes. I would go with whatever style works best for you.
@Amber: I agree. I get requested to accept unsolicited resumes all the time (I don't mind if people send them without asking my permission, either). Bankers run credit checks, doctors run tests, dentists take x-rays, interior decorators want to see the inside of the house they are being commissioned to decorate, architects need to know dimensions of properties they are designing houses for, etc. Why shouldn't recruiters ask for resumes? We aren't charging the candidate a penny, unlike all the previous examples I gave. If the candidates' resume is already on LinkedIn, how could it be such a sensitive subject? I've had people say "no", but generally I will talk to them in more detail and then usually get the resume. If not, there are always other candidates out there.
I would only ask for a resume from someone who has already indicated a strong interest in a specific opportunity, generally one which I had already provided a detailed job description for. But that doesn't necessarily involve speaking to them until I've gotten a little more information. No, I wouldn't ask for a resume from a complete stranger who had no idea of the job requirements ... But a candidate getting upset about being asked for a resume is a red flag. A more appropriate response would be: "I'd like to speak with you first before I send a resume. Please call me." If the headhunter continues to ignore that, then he is a jerk, but not necessarily an idiot. I've seen a lot of high-powered executives do 'jerky' things, but they generally had their reasons. Sometimes, it is very difficult for busy people to synch-up schedules. "I'll have my machine talk to your machine," is pretty common, as is phone-tag. Someone trying to expedite a search by asking for a resume can be a smart move, in some circumstances. I wouldn't do it, as a rule, however. And, yes, I've had doctors I've never met before tell me to get extensive amounts of tests before they would see me, and dentists, etc. And your 'credit score' is definitely already calculated and available to any person to whom you apply for credit. Car dealers have access to it... Headhunters should also be able to do credit checks on some of their clients to make sure that they can really pay fees... I've been lied to by a client before, and I should have insisted on a credit check before starting the search. The bottom line is, it's better to get the resume, documentation, etc. as early as possible.
Isn't this a fun thread?
Neither candidates nor recruiters are carbon copies of each other - so there won't be a one size fits all answer here. BUT in an industry where we fight for credibility and respect it might be worth our while to think about this from the candidate's perspective more often.
The problem isn't asking for a resume, it is the when and the how of the ask.
I can ask for anything I want at any time if I make the askee see it as something that is in their best interest. Yes, time kills all deals. Getting the resume fast is important, but so is earning the trust and respect of the candidate you might want to represent. In my world trust and respect trump pure speed - especially speed w/o skill and nuance and care.
In my opinion that is where Jack messed up. Great recruiters are able to make this happen almost effortlessly. It may even look a bit different every time, because people are different.
That is one reason why I love this business.
Lisa,
You're 100% right about the when and how comment. I like - no love, the fact that you rightly point out that we're always under the gun time wise as well.
Something no one has pointed out however IMHO is that recruiting is still a sales function, and getting people to start agreeing to our suggestions early and often is sometimes (please note that I said sometimes before anyone goes nuts) helpful.
Getting a resume from someone is a small signal of commitment to "the process" that scoots things along too no?
The caveat that everything is situation dependent shouldn't have to be stated but I guess I will add it in, since there are some strident comments flying around.
Comment
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
1801 members
316 members
180 members
190 members
222 members
34 members
62 members
194 members
619 members
530 members
© 2024 All Rights Reserved Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
With over 100K strong in our network, RecruitingBlogs.com is part of the RecruitingDaily.com, LLC family of Recruiting and HR communities.
Our goal is to provide information that is meaningful. Without compromise, our community comes first.
One Reservoir Corporate Drive
4 Research Drive – Suite 402
Shelton, CT 06484
Email us: info@recruitingdaily.com
All the recruiting news you see here, delivered straight to your inbox.
Just enter your e-mail address below
You need to be a member of RecruitingBlogs to add comments!
Join RecruitingBlogs